Live data from Hacker News

If you’re on the beach, this map shows you what’s across the ocean

knowmore.washingtonpost.com

1–10 of 29 posts

Re: If you’re on the beach, this map shows you what’s across the ocean

#7
This really shows just how "landlocked" [1] the People's Republic of China is by the chain of islands bordering it -- they have less ocean-facing coastline than Morocco, Portugal, and even Mauritania. Next time you read about the PRC (a) trying to assert naval power in the South China Sea, or (b) maintaining claims to Taiwan despite having never controlled it, think of this map and the near complete absence of the PRC on it. Access to the Pacific Ocean is critical to their strategic growth.

edit: [1] see grandchild comment

Re: If you’re on the beach, this map shows you what’s across the ocean

#8
post #5

somebody doesn't know squat about map projections...

care to explain?

The above poster is mistaking the "rule" that only the Mercator projection allows for straight lines to represent the meridians and parallels of the map. While this is true for both longitude and latitude on Mercator, only longitudes are allowed to be straight on pseudocylindrical projections (like the one shown in the OP). Since the map in the OP only draws along horizontal lines it's fine to use that type of projection.

Cylindrical (Mercator): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mercator_projection_SW.jp...

Pseudocylindrical (Wagner): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wagner_VI_projection_SW.j...

Re: If you’re on the beach, this map shows you what’s across the ocean

#10
post #8
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

care to explain?

The above poster is mistaking the "rule" that only the Mercator projection allows for straight lines to represent the meridians and parallels of the map. While this is true for both longitude and latitude on Mercator, only longitudes are allowed to be straight on pseudocylindrical projections (like the one shown in the OP). Since the map in the OP only draws along horizontal lines it's fine to use that type of projec…

I do indeed stand corrected. The projection wasn't stated and I presumed too much without really inspecting it.
Post reply on HN