Live data from Hacker News

OS X Yosemite

apple.com

101–110 of 307 posts

Re: OS X Yosemite

#101
post #70

Spotlight seems an awful lot like Alfred now. http://www.alfredapp.com/

Alfred does a lot more than that. But yes, the inspiration is obvious (and Alfred itself was inspired by Quicksilver).

Re: OS X Yosemite

#104
post #11

> With this new design, OS X...now looks a bit more like iOS 7, but > there is still quite a bit of depth. Indeed, more than flat, the > design almost seems to focus more on translucency than anything else. The above is an incomprehensible collection of words to me. I am not sure if this is because of my lack of an intimate connection to Apple products, terrible writing or some combination of the two.

What part don't you understand? I find it pretty clear.

Re: OS X Yosemite

#105
post #64

If possible, could someone from the Apple community please tell me if Yosemite will be faster / lighter than snow leopard? I don't want an OS that requires 8 gigs of ram to run "fast" like Mavericks requires.

You need to come to grips with the fact that SL was the high-water mark for OS coherency/consistency/quality from Apple.

You can't pour all of this time and energy into iOS and phones and still make something as clean as SL. Which is too bad.

FWIW, I continue to run SL on an early 2009 Mac Pro with no problems or annoyances ... hope that can continue.

Re: OS X Yosemite

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what they're doing on iOS7 also.

Not really. On iOS you can't/don't overlap windows, so its design language never had to describe this relationship. One of the questions floating around for the past few months was whether the next OSX would go in a flatter direction, and if so how they would cue window overlaps. It looks like the answers are (a) yes and (b) using roughly the same shadowing as before, plus translucence.

windows/views do overlap on iOS. Apple specifically mentioned translucency when demoing Control Center in iOS6 at WWDC last year. They are using the same playbook for OSX

Re: OS X Yosemite

#108
post #58

I'm really looking forward to this. Unlike iOS7, the flatter design here doesn't make me feel like a bunch of amateur artists got a hold of a free copy of Adobe Illustrator. I actually like the new look quite a bit. Now, to pray that they've made some under the hood progress on multi-monitor support. Moving work back and forth from desktop to mobile also sounds really amazing. I get a hint of it when working with gma…

There were multi-monitor updates in Mavericks - fixed most of my issues. What's still an issue for you?

This: http://superuser.com/questions/665004/how-do-you-prevent-the...

Re: OS X Yosemite

#109
post #80

Which parts of the front window in this screenshot[0] are draggable? Maybe this is just me, but I don't like how the titlebar and window contents are visually merged. [0] https://www.apple.com/osx/preview/images/overview_design_her...

Agreed. It seems to miss a step, some additional stuff that they couldn't include now but would have made the design complete.

For instance it would work if one could drag any area of a window that doesn't react to a click (like the white space between the bubbles in the chat window). Or additional gestures to easily rearrange/move the windows, something like three finger scroll make the window follow the fingers instead of back/forward.

Re: OS X Yosemite

#110
post #94
post #6

HandOff is the kind of thing I'm surprised took so long. Honestly, I was expecting MS to get something like it first. After all, your Windows Phone already runs Windows, right?

I'm especially shocked this has taken so long because the technology is ancient: Windows has had a "Use this computer as a Bluetooth Headset" option buried in the Bluetooth preferences for a long time now. The Address Book in Mac OS 10.0 and 10.1 would also let you send and receive SMSes with compatible phones (no joke): http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/wireless/2002/11/27/sms.html And Linux has had a few projects (li…

Sending SMSs from Address Book was a phenomenal feature. A shame that they yanked it years ago. Good to see its return.
Post reply on HN