Am I the only one here who hates to see Lucida Grande be replaced with Neue Helvetica Aslightaspossible? Eager to see how it looks on non-retina displays.
OS X Yosemite
41–50 of 307 posts
Re: OS X Yosemite
#42I don't care about flat or transparent. I just hope they effing fix windowing and multi-monitor support. ⌘+` is ridiculously buggy.
What issue do you usually have when you use ⌘+`? I haven't had any problems.
Also, the Z-ordering of windows seems really odd. If you have multiple windows open from two apps, and you ⌘+` between them, sometimes all of App A windows are brought to the front and App B windows are hidden. Other times only one App A window is brought up. Meanwhile, if you have App C chilling on a different monitor, it may or may not disappear at random.
Even if it worked as intended, it would be flawed when compared with Alt+Tab on windows.
Re: OS X Yosemite
#43Widgets, translucency, and animations... So... OS X 10.10 is... Windows Vista with Aero Glass? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a3/Windows_Vista....
First thing I thought of. "Look at how the background beautifully interacts with the translucent menu bar." Didn't we all turn that feature off back in 2007?! Though in fairness that was partly because it was such a hog on Vista. I've left translucency on in Win 7, though it sure isn't a productivity boost and it ain't 'beautiful' either.
Re: OS X Yosemite
#44Re: OS X Yosemite
#45Re: OS X Yosemite
#46These things tend to get rushed out, but maybe TC could have waited just a few more minutes to weed out the obvious stinkers.
Re: OS X Yosemite
#47Re: OS X Yosemite
#48So... Oh Ess Ten Ten Point Ten? Is that how it's pronounced? I suppose it's better than OS X X.X.
Re: OS X Yosemite
#49So... Oh Ess Ten Ten Point Ten? Is that how it's pronounced? I suppose it's better than OS X X.X.
Re: OS X Yosemite
#50HandOff is the kind of thing I'm surprised took so long. Honestly, I was expecting MS to get something like it first. After all, your Windows Phone already runs Windows, right?
A very philosophical question indeed.