Every time a self-driving car story pops up, I think of Rush's Red Barchetta. I have a sinking feeling we're eventually going to get to a point where traditional cars are completely outlawed. I definitely would love to be driven to work every morning, but I know I'd miss having the option to drive myself with the windows down. Driving can be fun!
Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
61–70 of 80 posts
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#62Every time a self-driving car story pops up, I think of Rush's Red Barchetta. I have a sinking feeling we're eventually going to get to a point where traditional cars are completely outlawed. I definitely would love to be driven to work every morning, but I know I'd miss having the option to drive myself with the windows down. Driving can be fun!
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I now realise that sitting in a self-driving car will cause me to press on the ghost brake pedal while sweating with anxiety No it won't. :) In next versions you will probably not be facing the road anyway. Do you "ghost brake" when driving in the back of a limousine?
I understand that facing backwards is safer in a head-on collision but a lot of people suffer from motion sickness (myself included). It has a lot to do with ability to see where you are going and hence predict/be aware of the vehicles movements. To put the extent of this in perspective, I am noticibly more likely to feel motion sick sitting in the back seat compared to sitting in the front seat. This effect is reduc…
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#64Every time a self-driving car story pops up, I think of Rush's Red Barchetta. I have a sinking feeling we're eventually going to get to a point where traditional cars are completely outlawed. I definitely would love to be driven to work every morning, but I know I'd miss having the option to drive myself with the windows down. Driving can be fun!
No need to outlaw anything. But getting a human driven car insured for urban traffic will be quite likely seen as a luxury/leisure expense someday.
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#65I wonder what car it is based on, if any. Is it electric or gasoline powered? The seats look like they're from a Fiat.
A little extra work on tension/tucking would have given a better fit and finish.
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#66Maybe they're actually going after the Asian market, and not the US one? It never ceases to amaze me how narrow minded much of the North American market is about the dichotomy between cute and cool/powerful. (You could quite easily make the case some markets are the extreme opposite). The console market has this too, which is one of the reasons the XBox brand has a sort of imposed low ceiling on success outside of th…
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#67Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#68I remember when the Aptera[1] was announced and "car people" slammed it for not looking like…a car. They wouldn't be caught dead driving such a strange-looking vehicle.
Does Google have a plan to address these criticisms and stop them from poisoning the discussion around the product?
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#69Maybe they're actually going after the Asian market, and not the US one? It never ceases to amaze me how narrow minded much of the North American market is about the dichotomy between cute and cool/powerful. (You could quite easily make the case some markets are the extreme opposite). The console market has this too, which is one of the reasons the XBox brand has a sort of imposed low ceiling on success outside of th…
Re: Why Google Made Its Self-Driving Car So Darn Cute
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the creature that IS in control has 100+ times more experience of driving than me, and is therefore unarguably a better driver Bingo. A self-driving car will have millions or billions of times more experience driving than you.
Another key thing about cars - microsecond response as opposed to millisecond response. There are a number of (but not all) situations where that 1000x reduced latency will make a difference between a collision and a miss. More importantly, the automated car will be able to scan 360 degrees for endless amounts of time with that same microsecond response. The tipping point for automated cars is going to happen faster…
I was just responding to the parent of my reply that yes, I do "ghost-brake", and so yes, efforts to make the car appear safer are a great idea, that will impact more people than the parent thought.