Live data from Hacker News

Don't mess with Newegg

blog.newegg.com

141–150 of 200 posts

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#141
I'm American, but have lived in Scandinavia for a couple years now. When I incorporated my bitty start-up last year, I could choose between incorporating here or in the US.

Despite the higher tax burden, I ultimately decided to incorporate here. Why? There were a lot of reasons, but the two biggest ones were: 1) I didn't want to worry about patent trolls 2) I didn't want to worry about net neutrality effecting my first users (we are starting local)

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#142
post #127
post #14

It seems to me that the legal system in the US is largely broken, and that just about anyone can be sued if only you find the right grounds. Being sued and defending yourself is enormously expensive which is what patent trolls exploit. Why not use this offensively against patent trolls? Find all sorts of ways to take them to court, the American legal seems to have plenty of opportunities in that regard. There are som…

It's weird that 40-45% of Congress is attorneys.

Some of that is what's become a standard career path for A.G.'s and prosecutors.

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#143

> Thanks to the efforts of Lee Cheng and his legal team, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a trial court to reconsider its earlier denial of Newegg’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs in the patent infringement lawsuit brought on by SUS. Wait, so what did the trial court conclude? Are they making the troll pay or not? I feel like I'm missing something? Also, isn't it worrying that they had to appeal in…

IANAL: The trial court had found for Newegg on the infringement case, but had not taken the additional step of awarding attorney's fees to Newegg. The appeals court has now recommended that the trial court take that additional step. The appeals court doesn't have time to wade through reams of legal invoices. Actually the trial court may have been trying to avoid that as well, but now it has no choice. It's my impress…

Living in a country where the default is that the loser pays (within reason), I must wonder: Why is discouraging litigation a bad thing?

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#144
The article is out of date -- in a good way -- on one point: It says that to recover attorneys' fees from a troll, the winning defendant must show that the troll acted in bad faith. The U.S. Supreme Court changed that rule last month, easing the burden of proof considerably, and giving trial judges far more latitude on that score. [1]

[1] http://patentlyo.com/patent/2014/04/discretion-attorney-liti..., by patent law professor Dennis Crouch.

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#145

This is an interview with Paul R. Ryan, former Forbes CEO and now the guy behind Acacia Research, the firm behind the Newegg patent law suit. Was surprised he is not as slimy as I expected: http://vimeo.com/57723958

If you're a slimy character, and you want to get to CEO the slime has to be inside, and invisible. These guys are very smart, and very manipulative. Think evil Derren Brown and you'll be close to the mark.

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#146

Newegg are cheapskates. The publicity from doing this pays far more than the money they'd save by settling with patent trolls.

Do you make all decisions based on potential profit, or do have a principle or two that you occasionally feel like standing up for?

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#148
post #127
post #14

It seems to me that the legal system in the US is largely broken, and that just about anyone can be sued if only you find the right grounds. Being sued and defending yourself is enormously expensive which is what patent trolls exploit. Why not use this offensively against patent trolls? Find all sorts of ways to take them to court, the American legal seems to have plenty of opportunities in that regard. There are som…

It's weird that 40-45% of Congress is attorneys.

I understand where you are coming from but it does seem straightforward that people who study the law would end up in careers where they write the law.

Re: Don't mess with Newegg

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IANAL: The trial court had found for Newegg on the infringement case, but had not taken the additional step of awarding attorney's fees to Newegg. The appeals court has now recommended that the trial court take that additional step. The appeals court doesn't have time to wade through reams of legal invoices. Actually the trial court may have been trying to avoid that as well, but now it has no choice. It's my impress…

Living in a country where the default is that the loser pays (within reason), I must wonder: Why is discouraging litigation a bad thing?

The balance to this is that corporations and rich individuals already have far more money to spend on a legal defense that further discouragement makes it that less likely that regular individuals will be able to use the legal system to redress civil wrongs that those parties have done to them.

I.E. the plot of the show Leverage.

Post reply on HN