Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if it is available a lot of companies just don't have the experience with IPv6 and are hesitant to turn it on. Which BTW sucks when you are trying to test your product on IPv6.
This is our problem. People just don't understand it in the operations team. Our devops guys know it inside out but they have to use the services the operations team hand out which means v4 and shitty hardware. Yes corporate structure sucks. The silly thing is that there are several NATs and brick walls in the company which wouldn't need to exist with v6. I myself am v6 end to end at home. Linode at the head end and…
IPv6 adoption rate above 3% even on Mondays now
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: IPv6 adoption rate above 3% even on Mondays now
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if it is available a lot of companies just don't have the experience with IPv6 and are hesitant to turn it on. Which BTW sucks when you are trying to test your product on IPv6.
You need to be able to show a business benefit before making changes like that; right now changing to ipv6 would give no benefit, require replacement of existing hardware and create additional troubleshooting load. Until that changes there won't be widespread adoption of ipv6 by businesses.
Not sure if that if that extends internationally
Re: IPv6 adoption rate above 3% even on Mondays now
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
And a staggeringly awful 0.24% in the UK.
Theres no real pressure here at the moment, so they won't do it in any hurry. Its not like theres a massive growth in houses being built.
Re: IPv6 adoption rate above 3% even on Mondays now
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if it is available a lot of companies just don't have the experience with IPv6 and are hesitant to turn it on. Which BTW sucks when you are trying to test your product on IPv6.
You need to be able to show a business benefit before making changes like that; right now changing to ipv6 would give no benefit, require replacement of existing hardware and create additional troubleshooting load. Until that changes there won't be widespread adoption of ipv6 by businesses.
This is the most ridiculous excuse people use. The premise doesn't even apply except in extreme cases:
1) 10+-year-old gear. (And even then only some; I've got plenty of decade-old gear lying around that supports IPv6 just fine.)
2) Extremely demanding performance requirements (to be in this category you'd likely be spending millions every year on gear and the people to run it).
3) Shitty $50 consumer gear.
If you're #1 or #3, you're going to need to fix that before long anyway, and even if you're #2, that's not applicable to your office network!
Hardware just isn't a good excuse for not turning on IPv6.