Earlier quoted context omitted.
"This article keeps saying in many words that the NSA would put Snowden on a boat to gitmo if they found out he hosted a CryptoParty." No, the actual words are just "That was a huge risk for him to teach a crypto party while he was working for the NSA." It was a risk for him, the kind of like organizing "don't drink sugar water" event while working for Coca Cola which has effectively its own police, and that at the t…
> Coca Cola which has effectively its own police Link with more info?
Snowden organized a "let's use Tor" event after he apparently already downloaded some secret documents and contacted a journalist. And the top commenter disputes the claim "That was a huge risk for him to teach a crypto party while he was working for the NSA" falsely claiming that the article "keeps saying in many words that the NSA would put Snowden on a boat to gitmo if they found out he hosted a CryptoParty." It doesn't. But I also claim that it was a potential risk for him as there was some chance that somebody in charge for security starts to investigate what he does or already did.
And if I understood other sources, at that time Snowden actually worked for a private company (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.)
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405270230462680...
which had the contracts with NSA. Still, apparently exactly working in that company gave him access to the secret documents he wanted to take.