Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
shortcutfoo.com
Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#2Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#3example ctrl-f in emacs. along with the description "move forward a word" i'd also like to see (perhaps on the side of the screen) an editor move a word ahead. That way there are two reinforcements; the verbal description and the observed action
also many of the shortcuts trigger browser shortcuts. I don't know a workaround, but it's mighty irritating.
Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#4Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#5Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#6Interesting, but for me useless. I use vim each and every day, and I think I have a good claim to some muscle memory. But this excercise asks you to press keys with no context. I can navigate with hjkl just fine, but actually struggled to remember which key to press. But in vim I'm fine. Separating the shortcuts from the editor is not a good thing.
Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#7Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#8Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#9Re: Build Muscle Memory With Your Favorite Editor
#10It would make more sense to present an editor and ask the user to make a specific high-level change (such as refactoring a function), let the user do so, and then analyze their input to figure out whether they could have done so more efficiently. For instance, in vim, did they navigate by hitting hjkl or use a more efficient /search, and did they hit delete/x repeatedly or use something like c2w?