Live data from Hacker News

_why is no more

twitter.com

191–200 of 421 posts

Re: _why is no more

#191
post #150
post #2

I just noticed that _why apparently deleted his twitter account. I then found that that wasn't all he deleted: http://twitter.com/_why http://github.com/why http://whytheluckystiff.net/ http://poignantguide.net/ http://hackety.org/ http://shoooes.net/ All disappeared... For those who don't know who I'm talking about: http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_lucky_stiff

Someone outed him here: http://whoiswhytheluckystiff.wordpress.com/

Nope, whoever created this site was trolled.

Re: _why is no more

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It could be a dead man's switch. (But I'm really hoping it's not.)

How exactly do you implement a dead man's switch for your online accounts? Do you just leave your account info for your estate's executor, lawyer, friend, or whatever and he manually deletes them? Or do you have some script that will automatically run and delete your accounts if you don't tell it not to every week or so? I've often what happens to people's free email addresses after they die. (I suppose nothing in mo…

These (dead mans switches) are online services which can terminate accounts for you and send emails on your behalf. Some of them work by sending you an email once a month or so to check up on you, if you don't reply, the switch is triggered.

Re: _why is no more

#193
post #184

Perhaps he's rebooting his online identity? http://www.jonathanpaulgillette.com/

That's just weird enough to be plausible -- there's pictures of the Shoes shoes, kitties, rainbows, needlepoint, and Tom Cruise giving a piggy back ride.

Re: _why is no more

#194

Man - what a bum out. The talk he gave at art + code was awesome and seriously inspired me to focus more on educational material for teaching kids to program. I hope he at least gives a more valid reason for removing everything. I can understand letting something become dormant - but others can take what you have done and be inspired and or build upon it. That is not a slight to you it's just the way a system grows.…

Please tell me this talk is online.

Re: _why is no more

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mean-spirited? he gave the internet a challenge and somebody took it up, that's all. oh, and it doesn't have to be his real name, too.

By using a pseudonym, he implied he'd rather not be known by his given name. Telling the world his real then goes against his wishes. It is, at the very least, rude. That someone outed him is inevitable. But that doesn't excuse the act.

Rude, I'd agree. No more, though - we're certainly not talking about exposing where Salman Rushdie's sleeping tonight. How rude, even, is an open question. This doesn't exactly rise to the level of pestering J. D. Salinger at his house.

Trying to be anonymous is one thing. Trying to remain anonymous while writing books and blogs and making public appearances, all under one common identity, is downright quixotic and just a bit presumptuous. Simply saying his preference was to be anonymous doesn't really create much of an obligation upon the rest of the world. You can't actively be a public figure and avoid being public.

Re: _why is no more

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

moot's identity was revealed. weev I've not seen any proof yet that he's been outed. I'll correct my post.

If you're referring to moot's supposed identity "Christopher Poole," you're wrong. There's no verification that that is his real name, and I think it's just a joke. Just look at the initials: CP. For those of you who are uninitiated, "CP" is a 4chan meme for child pornography, and is closely associated with Pedobear.

No verification? He's been interviewed, at his home, by multiple magazines. I recall his parents were interviewed. And I've seen him at panels: He's not like most 4channers. I doubt he'd pull an elaborate prank. On the other hand, 4channers are retarded enough to assume he would.

Re: _why is no more

#197
post #2

I just noticed that _why apparently deleted his twitter account. I then found that that wasn't all he deleted: http://twitter.com/_why http://github.com/why http://whytheluckystiff.net/ http://poignantguide.net/ http://hackety.org/ http://shoooes.net/ All disappeared... For those who don't know who I'm talking about: http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_lucky_stiff

Someone has already edited his Wikipedia page to mention his online disappearance.

and I deleted his "real" name that they put on there.

Re: _why is no more

#198
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone outed him here: http://whoiswhytheluckystiff.wordpress.com/

Something doesn't seem right about that detective work - there's a Jonathan Gillette online who is a web developer in Harrisburg, PA who doesn't seem to be _why. Obviously it's likely that there's more than one Jonathan Gillette on the internet, but it seems odd to me that this other guy is also a web developer, with a decent online presence, in (somewhat) the same geographic area where _why is suspected to live, tha…

http://jonathangillette.net/ is defiantly not him. The site runs on PHP.

Re: _why is no more

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

moot's identity was revealed. weev I've not seen any proof yet that he's been outed. I'll correct my post.

If you're referring to moot's supposed identity "Christopher Poole," you're wrong. There's no verification that that is his real name, and I think it's just a joke. Just look at the initials: CP. For those of you who are uninitiated, "CP" is a 4chan meme for child pornography, and is closely associated with Pedobear.

Is there any reason to believe that Time, WSJ, etc., DIDN'T do any fact checking on the name they printed?

Re: _why is no more

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of _why's projects were that big, so in this case it's kind of a moot point.

Not true. Hpricot and Syck are in heavy use.

I meant big in the lines-of-code sense, not in how much they're used. (looks like I missed the edit window.)
Post reply on HN