Live data from Hacker News

Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

kickstarter.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

#41

Unlike Nest, which I've always seen as a gimmick sold on false advertising, I believe this has legs. Making these kinds of air conditioning units into intelligent devices could have significant effects. Why do think I Nest is a gimmick almost bordering on a marketing scam? Because in only works in a relatively narrow range of applications (i.e.: small one or two room apartment). In a larger family home --and particul…

I rent a 2000 sq ft 2-story house. My wife and I have somewhat irregular schedules, and the fact that we rent means I can't make big changes like installing a whole-house fan. But I can change the thermostat. Nest saved us on average $50-100/month vs the same months last year. I'm sure I could get far more savings with something different like you suggest, but again my options are limited. Nest paid for itself severa…

My guess is that a cheap programmable thermostat would have done that for you just as well. An A/C unit has to be off for a large chunk of time per day to save $100 per month.

There's the other element here which is just plain being lazy and wanting to be comfortable 100% of the time. No, I am not calling you this. Just making a general statement. I've walked into my home when it is 80 to 85 degrees F. I don't need the air conditioner to turn on an hour before I get home to get it down to 72 degrees (or whatever). I am perfectly fine getting home and turning it on (if the programmable thermostat didn't) and waiting 15 to 20 minutes while having a cold glass of water as it the temperature goes down.

Yet another reality is that the cooling process is far more efficient the longer you can wait. What I mean by this is that a good air conditioning unit is cycle limited to somewhere around a 50 degree F delta between outside and inside temperatures. That's governed by the physics of the heat exchange circuit. And so, in simple terms, if it is cooler outside your A/C unit will be able to cool your house much faster because it is able to pump cooler air into your home. There's a huge difference between trying to cool a house with 60 degree air vs. 50 degree air.

Finally, one thing you can probably do as a renter is to install a misting system around the A/C condensing unit (usually installed outside the house). Wet air has greater heat capacity than dry air and so the system will operate more efficiently. It is easy to rig a 12 or 24 volt solenoid valve to open when the compressor runs so the mister can provide moist air to the heat exchanger. This alone is bound to produce results significantly better --again-- than a Nest. And, of course, it wouldn't cost much more than $30 to $50 to implement.

In places where people can't be bothered to at least attempt to understand the situation and at the very least spend some time programming their thermostat, setting reasonable temperatures and taking five minutes to open windows at night, well, yeah, Nest might serve in a range from placebo to small savings.

My key argument is that a single thermostat isn't a solution to a systemic problem. Most homes are not designed to be efficient in this regard, which is sad.

Re: Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

#42

Unlike Nest, which I've always seen as a gimmick sold on false advertising, I believe this has legs. Making these kinds of air conditioning units into intelligent devices could have significant effects. Why do think I Nest is a gimmick almost bordering on a marketing scam? Because in only works in a relatively narrow range of applications (i.e.: small one or two room apartment). In a larger family home --and particul…

Your argument is mostly right in terms of what would be required (the super-high efficiency filter is not necessary, nor are attic fans, to achieve anything interesting), but actually, you have to have multiple condensing units past a certain point. It's simply not efficient, even with auto-closing dampers, to zone and duct a multi-zone system with single condensing units. You'd be much better off, efficiency wise, e…

> It's simply not efficient, even with auto-closing dampers, to zone and duct a multi-zone system with single condensing units.

You are absolutely correct. You end-up running a huge compressor for a small zone.

I've always like the idea of chiller systems and the general concept of storing what you need during times of high efficiency to bend the curve in your direction.

I haven't done any math on this at all but I've wondered what it might be like to cool the massive foundation slab most homes have as well as the ground directly underneath them during the night. Again, I haven't thought this through at all. Just thinking now that you would want to treat the soil in order to have a stab at improving heat capacity, etc. You could then use that during the day in a very careful way to compensate for heat flow. I almost envision radiator panels embedded into the walls with sensors to pump heat into the cold ground only as needed. Anyhow, there's probably a million things wrong with that idea. Air conditioning is one of these things that could be so much better.

Re: Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I rent a 2000 sq ft 2-story house. My wife and I have somewhat irregular schedules, and the fact that we rent means I can't make big changes like installing a whole-house fan. But I can change the thermostat. Nest saved us on average $50-100/month vs the same months last year. I'm sure I could get far more savings with something different like you suggest, but again my options are limited. Nest paid for itself severa…

My guess is that a cheap programmable thermostat would have done that for you just as well. An A/C unit has to be off for a large chunk of time per day to save $100 per month. There's the other element here which is just plain being lazy and wanting to be comfortable 100% of the time. No, I am not calling you this. Just making a general statement. I've walked into my home when it is 80 to 85 degrees F. I don't need t…

> My guess is that a cheap programmable thermostat would have done that for you just as well

You're probably right, had I figured out how to use it (that's what I replaced with Nest). Like most things it's probably most efficient when I put the effort in, but that's the magic of Nest -- a huge work:savings ratio. You're right about laziness. Banking on laziness is a great business model -- find something people are lazy about, automate it to be maybe 60% of optimal and charge $$$$ for it.

> Wet air has greater heat capacity than dry air and so the system will operate more efficiently.

I grew up in a house with a swamp cooler now that I think about it. It worked pretty well.

We just had an offer accepted on a home, so I'm bookmarking your comments. Maybe I can implement some of them soon!

Re: Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

#44

Unlike Nest, which I've always seen as a gimmick sold on false advertising, I believe this has legs. Making these kinds of air conditioning units into intelligent devices could have significant effects. Why do think I Nest is a gimmick almost bordering on a marketing scam? Because in only works in a relatively narrow range of applications (i.e.: small one or two room apartment). In a larger family home --and particul…

You mention this magical whole house fan multiple times across your responses, but how exactly would a fan help those of us living where it's 70-80 F at night? I have one and besides being obnoxiously loud, on one of the aforementioned nights, it'd simply end up blowing around that hot, humid air without actually cooling anything.

There's no other way to put it: In some parts of the world you are simply screwed. I am lucky in that I have 50 to 60 degree air available at night during most of the summer. During the day it's 110+, so you learn to manage heat-flow very quickly if you want to save money. If I could get away with paining my roof white I would.

If I lived in an area where it's still hot at night and owned my own home I'd look into ways to store thermal energy at night when A/C units are more efficient. Here's a stupid example not fully thought out: I'd install a swimming pool as large as I could handle and chill that water at night.

A decent size swimming pool can easily have 25,000 gallons of water. Rough calculation: That's about 200,000 lbs of water. 1 BTU raises 1 gallon of water by 1 degree F. So, if you cool 200,000 lbs of water by just one degree you've stored 200,000 BTU's. A typical mid to large home A/C unit is 3 to 5 tons, which means 36,000 to 60,000 BTU's. As you can see, if you can efficiently cool down a large mass of water at night during high-efficiency and low electricity bills period you might just be able to sink heat from the house back into the pool during the day with a suitable heat exchanger. Again, seat of the pants stuff. I haven't thought it through in any detail because until I build my own house (on my bucket list) I have need to do so. So, call it a crazy idea at this point. Probably a bad one at that.

Re: Tado Cooling – Intelligent AC control

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Either you have motor controlled dampers, which means the system can't be entirely responsive all the time, or everything is open all the time, which means you are losing a lot of airflow to parts you don't need them.

It is motor controlled. It has two thermostats and it adjusts the motors to only heat or cool one floor. I'm not seeing why that wouldn't be equivalent to two units.

Okay:

Two small units

For the sake of argument, let's make everything otherwise equivalent. We'll say the small units are 1.5kw each

When upstairs and downstairs call for heat, you use ... 3kw When upstairs calls for heat alone, you use 1.5kw When downstairs calls for heat alone, you use 1.5kw

Ducting/blower loss from this setup (assumes two completely separate duct runs): 0%

One large unit:

3.0kw to make life easy (in reality, if you use small units, you often need less)

When upstairs and downstairs call for heat, you use ... 3kw When upstairs calls for heat alone, you use 3kw When downstairs calls for heat alone, you use 3kw

Ducting loss from this setup: 25-30% (at least, it's just the way it goes due to longer duct runs, more tees, etc. If you have, say, flex runs, it'd be even more)

It is essentially guaranteed to run for more than half the time of the smaller units (due to ducting loss, etc), making overall cost more.

Note that if you had mini-splits as the small units, the comparison would be crazily in favor of that. you'd have no loss due to ducting, they would almost certainly be DC based, and would be completely variable to actual load (even a "variable speed blower" on a large unit isn't), not 1.5kw on/off. Smaller unit efficiency is also almost always greater than larger unit efficiency.

Also note this is all a comparison of efficiency. It may be more cost effective to do one or the other (though it depends how long you own the house, insulation, blah blah blah)

Post reply on HN