Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#12This is a rather silly statement - most of Mozilla's funding already comes from Google, and has for a while.
If you want to make Mozilla less reliant on "big brands", it's very easy - just donate[0]. Every dollar from its users makes Mozilla slightly less dependent on advertising money.
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#13Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#14It would also be in their interest to have customers pay a base fee as then It would be much easier for them to sell extended services like music, movies and privacy.
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#15I'd love for the possibility to start paying for stuff again. Adds bore me. I wonder how much one would reasonably have to pay to make adds go away completely from Google and friends. It would also be in their interest to have customers pay a base fee as then It would be much easier for them to sell extended services like music, movies and privacy.
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#16Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#17If this functionality really must be supported, then why isn't it just offered via an extension? Those Firefox users who want this functionality have the option of installing that extension. Otherwise, it doesn't interfere with other users who do not desire its presence.
Firefox needs to make money. An optional extension that hardly anyone will install won't help with that.
What you've missed is the overarching issue here, though.
Mozilla will strip out useful functionality from Firefox (like the status bar, for example), and anyone desiring such functionality is told to install some extension to restore the now-missing functionality.
If such an attitude is acceptable when it comes to functionality that Firefox users find useful, then it is just as acceptable when it comes to functionality that Mozilla may find useful.
Mozilla should offer this as an optional extension. If users wish to financially support Mozilla in this way, then they are free to install it and provide such financial support. Otherwise, Firefox users aren't subjected to financing Mozilla in a way that may not be considered acceptable.
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#18Why not? I see the same stuff every day, could do with some interesting content
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#19> The problem, however, is that this doesn’t really fit into Mozilla’s brand image. It’s supposed to be an independent, mission-driven organization. Once it starts taking money from big brands, it will be harder to maintain this image. This is a rather silly statement - most of Mozilla's funding already comes from Google, and has for a while. If you want to make Mozilla less reliant on "big brands", it's very easy -…
However, a lot of their recent actions have seriously dissuaded me from doing so.
Desktop Firefox, for example, has gotten progressively worse over time. A lot of useful functionality has been stripped out, and the Chrome-like UI these days is much less efficient and effective than the Firefox 3.5.x UI was.
Mobile Firefox on Android doesn't exactly offer a very pleasant experience.
They basically gave up on Thunderbird.
They've wasted resources on unnecessary and unwanted efforts like Persona and Firefox OS.
Asm.js is not a very sound approach, especially compared to technology like Native Client.
Rust seems promising, but won't be seriously usable until at least Rust 1.0, which still seems a long way off. As the year progresses, I get more and more doubtful that it'll be out during 2014, like was claimed earlier this year.
As it stands now, Mozilla is now offering me far less useful products than they once were. I've also seen them squander a lot of the resources they already had on unnecessary products. And their future offerings aren't very inspiring, either. I just can't convince myself that any donation I do make would be used in a productive manner, I'm sad to say.
Re: Mozilla Is Moving Ahead With Sponsored Tiles On Firefox’s New-Tab Page
#20> The problem, however, is that this doesn’t really fit into Mozilla’s brand image. It’s supposed to be an independent, mission-driven organization. Once it starts taking money from big brands, it will be harder to maintain this image. This is a rather silly statement - most of Mozilla's funding already comes from Google, and has for a while. If you want to make Mozilla less reliant on "big brands", it's very easy -…
I occasionally use Firefox and other offerings from Mozilla. And so I'd be very willing to directly donate money to them, as well. However, a lot of their recent actions have seriously dissuaded me from doing so. Desktop Firefox, for example, has gotten progressively worse over time. A lot of useful functionality has been stripped out, and the Chrome-like UI these days is much less efficient and effective than the Fi…
by what metrics? it uses less RAM, runs faster JS, renders faster, is easier to write add-ons for, is more in line with the HTML5 feature-set...
> Mobile Firefox on Android doesn't exactly offer a very pleasant experience.
compared to what? the stock browser? mobile chrome? in my experience it blows both of those out of the water.
> They've wasted resources on unnecessary and unwanted efforts like Persona and Firefox OS.
Persona was a three person, part-time team for under a year. It is used pretty widely, and has sufficient community support to continue past Mozilla's devs moving off of it. It and Firefox OS, imo, are the two most promising things that Mozilla is doing right now. Mozilla's mission is to stave off a walled-garden web wherever it rears its ugly head. I can think of no areas where this is in a worse state than mobile OS's and "login with X".
> They basically gave up on Thunderbird.
True. Probably their biggest mistake of the last three years, imo
> Asm.js is not a very sound approach, especially compared to technology like Native Client.
a very hotly debated topic by most of the leading voices in the field; far from a settled issue.
> Rust seems promising, but won't be seriously usable until at least Rust 1.0, which still seems a long way off. As the year progresses, I get more and more doubtful that it'll be out during 2014, like was claimed earlier this year.
fair enough. i don't currently doubt they'll just make it in 2014 tho