31–40 of 109 posts
So who's buying the IPO? Seems much better investment than SV companies with little or no profit. I wonder how it will affect YHOO -- Probably worth buying Jan 2015 $40 calls since Yahoo owns 24% stake, maybe even short AMZN on day of IPO.
I love this article. Despite the multitudes of news sources telling us about how commerce is now global and business is no longer tied to a place and the internet is changing the world, there is still an ocean of enterprises of which we US-based-or-english-speaking technologists are ignorant. Take a moment to think about this: Alibaba is a huge company, growing in an absolutely enormous market, providing a pile of se…
My favorite quote in this regard is by William Gibson: "The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed"
online payments ---- google wallet cloud services ---- google cloud platform mobile apps ---- google play mobile OS ---- android maps and nav ---- google maps physical retail ---- ? no google product shopping deals ---- google offers cloud storage ---- google drive instant messaging ---- google hangouts car service ---- uber (via google ventures) c2c ecommerce ---- ? no google product travel booking ---- google fligh…
Although Alibaba is a huge company that does a ton of different things, I feel like this article went out of the way to avoid mentioning that companies like Google and Amazon (as well as Microsoft and Apple to a lesser extent) come close to checking all of these boxes. The other thing to point out is that Alibaba owns stakes in many of these companies and doesn't really own them outright. As others have already point…
* Self-service warehousing and distribution (Fulfillment by Amazon)
* Package Delivery (Google Shopping Express, AmazonFresh) TV setup box (Amazon FireTV)
* Search Engine (Google Search) Web Browser (Chrome)
* Laptop/Desktop OS (Chrome OS)
* Wearable Tech (Android Wear, Google Glass) etc.
Also for many offerings like Aliyun and Aliyun OS pale in comparison in the features offered by AWS or Android.
I went to an Alibaba presentation in the US awhile ago. They want to pursue the same strategy as Google and focus deep on big data and Machine Learning rather than building out huge logistic infrastructure like Amazon. This is probably a good idea since the margins are better.
I love this article. Despite the multitudes of news sources telling us about how commerce is now global and business is no longer tied to a place and the internet is changing the world, there is still an ocean of enterprises of which we US-based-or-english-speaking technologists are ignorant. Take a moment to think about this: Alibaba is a huge company, growing in an absolutely enormous market, providing a pile of se…
LOL. I don't get how your comment is at the top. People in technology field know about it.
Your question should be how China is blocking out other tech companies unless they are willing to share their user info or join a state-owned venture so they can learn your technology, process and know-how then push you out. You make it sound like no one from U.S. want China or other market.
The FACT TO THE MATTER is how other countries is either making it extremely difficult for U.S. tech company to enter or corrupted to hell that you have to pay out of your ass in each and every step of the way to do business with them.
This comment is the most retarded comment there is. PEOPLE IN TECH KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON!
Although Alibaba is a huge company that does a ton of different things, I feel like this article went out of the way to avoid mentioning that companies like Google and Amazon (as well as Microsoft and Apple to a lesser extent) come close to checking all of these boxes. The other thing to point out is that Alibaba owns stakes in many of these companies and doesn't really own them outright. As others have already point…
I love this article. Despite the multitudes of news sources telling us about how commerce is now global and business is no longer tied to a place and the internet is changing the world, there is still an ocean of enterprises of which we US-based-or-english-speaking technologists are ignorant. Take a moment to think about this: Alibaba is a huge company, growing in an absolutely enormous market, providing a pile of se…
Agreed. It's not just in the tech sector, and not just in the commerce sector either. The US (and many English-speaking countries) tend to be incredibly US-centric and euro-centric in their worldview and news coverage.
For example, right now, the world's largest democracy is holding the largest democratic election in the history of human civilization[0]. In the US, you'd be hard-pressed to find people who even know the names of the candidates[1]. Most people I talk to aren't even aware that it's happening - which is delightfully ironic for a country that has a history of proselytizing the gospel of democracy by using its military to install "democratic" governments abroad[2]!
[0] For those interested in reading up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_general_election,_2014
[1] Sort of a trick question in parliamentary systems (as opposed to the presidential system in the US), but my statement applies whether you ask about the names of the two major parties or the names of their leaders.
[2] Iraq is the example that most people are familiar with, though this tradition goes back a century or more.
I love this article. Despite the multitudes of news sources telling us about how commerce is now global and business is no longer tied to a place and the internet is changing the world, there is still an ocean of enterprises of which we US-based-or-english-speaking technologists are ignorant. Take a moment to think about this: Alibaba is a huge company, growing in an absolutely enormous market, providing a pile of se…