Live data from Hacker News

We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

twitter.com

1–10 of 225 posts

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#4
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

It's secured by a four digit password and self destruction after three consecutive invalid PIN entries. Which is plenty secure against brute force. Or is that just the way it works around here?

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#5
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Cards are way different. They combine something you have (the card) with something you know (the PIN). After three false attempts to enter the PIN you have to unlock the card going a different route. In such a scenario, 4 digits are fine.

You can't lock accounts only protected by a password and accessible by anyone (via internet) this way as this would invite for Denial-of-Service attacks (locking your account with three failed attempts).

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#6
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Mine is 10 digits. I thought the 4 digit limit was just a societal assumption? (I'm being serious, I thought it was (near) universally allowed to be longer, people just didn't bother.)

Is this not the case?

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#7
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Well, it's not like my card is hooked up to the internet for everybody to try and log in.

PIN isn't particularly vulnerable to brute force anyway, as number of failed authorisation attempts is strictly limited to something like 3, and a fraudster has to risk capture by being physically present at each attempt or 'trying out' a stolen card, and having their face recorded on cameras.

I haven't seen any advantages for using 6-digit or larger "passwords" for that particular scenario. The largest practical security benefit seems to come from enforcing random PINs and not allowing to choose - since the banks that allow to choose are vulnerable to "dictionary attacks" of trying the user's birthday (obvious from other stuff in a stolen wallet) and stuff like 1234.

Now, checking "signature" instead of chip&pin, now that's an example of blind trust.

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#8
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Losing passwords is bad because they get reused. 4-digit pin not so much, debit card is basically the only thing that uses it.

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#9
post #6
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Mine is 10 digits. I thought the 4 digit limit was just a societal assumption? (I'm being serious, I thought it was (near) universally allowed to be longer, people just didn't bother.) Is this not the case?

Great, now I need to change all my pin numbers. :)

Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting

#10
post #6
post #3

Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.

Mine is 10 digits. I thought the 4 digit limit was just a societal assumption? (I'm being serious, I thought it was (near) universally allowed to be longer, people just didn't bother.) Is this not the case?

I believe some cash machines in the UK don't require you to press 'enter' after typing in your code, they just 'go' after 4 have been entered.
Post reply on HN