We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
1–10 of 225 posts
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#2Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#3Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#4Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#5Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
You can't lock accounts only protected by a password and accessible by anyone (via internet) this way as this would invite for Denial-of-Service attacks (locking your account with three failed attempts).
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#6Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
Is this not the case?
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#7Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
PIN isn't particularly vulnerable to brute force anyway, as number of failed authorisation attempts is strictly limited to something like 3, and a fraudster has to risk capture by being physically present at each attempt or 'trying out' a stolen card, and having their face recorded on cameras.
I haven't seen any advantages for using 6-digit or larger "passwords" for that particular scenario. The largest practical security benefit seems to come from enforcing random PINs and not allowing to choose - since the banks that allow to choose are vulnerable to "dictionary attacks" of trying the user's birthday (obvious from other stuff in a stolen wallet) and stuff like 1234.
Now, checking "signature" instead of chip&pin, now that's an example of blind trust.
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#8Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#9Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
Mine is 10 digits. I thought the 4 digit limit was just a societal assumption? (I'm being serious, I thought it was (near) universally allowed to be longer, people just didn't bother.) Is this not the case?
Re: We'd lose our security certificate if we allowed pasting
#10Before laughing at how stupid this is, remember that your debit card is secured by a password that consists of exactly four decimal digits. I really wonder when this is finally going to change, but I hear some futuristic banks allow up to six digits already.
Mine is 10 digits. I thought the 4 digit limit was just a societal assumption? (I'm being serious, I thought it was (near) universally allowed to be longer, people just didn't bother.) Is this not the case?