Live data from Hacker News

The End of Food?

newyorker.com

41–50 of 74 posts

Re: The End of Food?

#41

It's like saying sex toys will eventually replace having sex because why waste time dating, courting and then having sex :) when you could just use a toy + redtube and get it over with in 10 minutes.

Watch the Demolition Man "sex scene": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80UQWWUIYs

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106697/

Re: The End of Food?

#42
post #8

> One of Silicon Valley’s cultural exports in the past ten years has been the concept of “lifehacking”: devising tricks to streamline the obligations of daily life, thereby freeing yourself up for whatever you’d rather be doing Well, to be frank, I'd rather be eating. What's the point of your life if you don't have time to even eat, let alone enjoy yourself.

  "Good morning," said the little prince.
  "Good morning," said the merchant.
  
  This was a merchant who sold pills that had been invented to
  quench thirst. You need only swallow one pill a week, and you
  would feel no need of anything to drink.
  
  "Why are you selling those?" asked the little prince.
  
  "Because they save a tremendous amount of time," said the
  merchant. "Computations have been made by experts. With these
  pills, you save fifty-three minutes in every week."
  
  "And what do I do with those fifty-three minutes?"
  
  "Anything you like . . ."
  
  "As for me," said the little prince to himself, "if I had
  fifty-three minutes to spend as I liked, I should walk at my
  leisure toward a spring of fresh water."

The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Re: The End of Food?

#43
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

Agreed. The stated purpose of Soylent is not to replace all meals. It is to be a convenient replacement for inconvenient meals. But, that idea doesn't grab enough attention to sell ad space. Therefore, pretty much every article I've read about Soylent tries to manufacture controversy around the idea of giving up on food entirely in favor of brown paste.

That said, when my month's supply arrives, I'm looking forward to giving up food for a month entirely in favor of brown paste. I see it as a fun opportunity for an interesting cleanse --not a permanent lifestyle change.

Every report I've read from people trying out a 100% Soylent diet has been consistent: You feel fine. Your jaw gets stiff from underuse (chewing gum is recommended). You poop less and less often. The biggest problem is really social awkwardness. Eating with people is important. It's awkward being the guy at the table with a bottle of brown paste.

Re: The End of Food?

#44
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

> Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it".

Because the original posts about it talked about replacing almost all meals with it, to the extent that it included a description of how replacing almost all meal with it caused Rhinehart to almost stop defecating.

And because it's easier to get media interested in a story they can title "The end of food" or "The Man Who Would Make Food Obsolete" (recent Atlantic headline) rather than "Yet another meal replacement".

And because a marketing aspect of Soylent is the idea that even if you probably won't replace every meal with it, you can.

(For my part I'm interested in it to try replacing some meals - certainly not all - but that angle would certainly make for a whole lot less PR interest)

Re: The End of Food?

#45
money quote from the article:

Perhaps the main difference between Soylent and drinks like Ensure and Muscle Milk lies in the marketing

It's amazing how taking an old product and repackaging it for a different purpose can be a source of business success and glory. I believe this is the story behind both Coca Cola and RedBull.

Re: The End of Food?

#46
post #11

Somehow that title, contrasted with the chart ( http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/01/business/economy/changed-l... ) showing how the price of food, especially has gone up in recent years while tech prices have fallen, makes me worry about a future reality where real food is so expensive it's only for the elite, and everyone else subsists on supplements like Soylent.

This is part of the plot of "Soylent Green". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_green

Right. Disconcerting to see its namesake being a foreshadow of said plot becoming quasi-reality.

Re: The End of Food?

#47
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

Agreed. The stated purpose of Soylent is not to replace all meals. It is to be a convenient replacement for inconvenient meals. But, that idea doesn't grab enough attention to sell ad space. Therefore, pretty much every article I've read about Soylent tries to manufacture controversy around the idea of giving up on food entirely in favor of brown paste. That said, when my month's supply arrives, I'm looking forward t…

> Your jaw gets stiff from underuse

I had not heard of this side effect. I would have thought that regular talking would have sufficed. Very interesting!

Re: The End of Food?

#48
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

Because ideally you could replace all of your meals with it. I'd be happy with not having to have a fridge if all I need is Soylent.

Re: The End of Food?

#49
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

Agreed. The stated purpose of Soylent is not to replace all meals. It is to be a convenient replacement for inconvenient meals. But, that idea doesn't grab enough attention to sell ad space. Therefore, pretty much every article I've read about Soylent tries to manufacture controversy around the idea of giving up on food entirely in favor of brown paste. That said, when my month's supply arrives, I'm looking forward t…

Do, please, keep us updated on that experiment. I did not even realise that Soylent was an actual product (presumably, not made of people) until I read your comment.

Re: The End of Food?

#50
post #36

I find it annoying that whenever Soylent is discussed, people always take such an extreme view of it. Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it". It's similar to stories about electric cars. Someone will always comment about how electric cars won't work for people who have to drive 500 km non stop on a daily basis, therefore they are doomed to failure.

Why do so many people frame the discussion with "you will replace all meals with it".

Wasn't that it's original pitch? I'm pretty sure that when the Soylent guy first started talking about his idea the Unique Selling Point, compared to all the other meal replacement products already out there, was that Soylent would be the first product engineered to completely and permanently replace the need for any other food.

Post reply on HN