Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope. JS has technical problems which were all stated clearly and with references to academic works and industry examples (Google). You simply choose to ignore my carefully worded criticism calling it a “rant” and an “easy answer” and “à la mode”, with talk of irrelevant things like C/C++ and platitudes about Turing machines.
Sorry to see you downvoting a comment which doesn't please your expectations. 1) You are ignoring the notion of some, if not most, of the incriminated features being also present in highly regarded languages. 2) "Most of the rants" (please mind the plural) doesn't address your post, but is on certain communities which are producing anti-JavaScripts post in series. 3) "easy answer" is quite what it means. There are so…
And BTW, you accused me of things (in the post above) that weren't in my statement at all. I was just pointing out that there was in deed a point made by briantakita by noting that the various articles on JS published lately are mostly originating from communities grouped around other languages. And that perspectives may vary. Even the criticism on JS varies over time.