Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
kickstarter.com
Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#2Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#3Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#4I agree this is a pretty clever idea. A mouse needs one hand to use and a keyboard needs two; there's no way to keep your hands in one area the whole time you use a computer without something like this.
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#5I agree this is a pretty clever idea. A mouse needs one hand to use and a keyboard needs two; there's no way to keep your hands in one area the whole time you use a computer without something like this.
What about trackpoints? That's one of the reasons why I keep buying thinkpads.
Also, Eye tracking is frighteningly good and has been for a long time now. I wonder why contextual menus based on eye movements and hand gestures haven't been forwarded.
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#6I agree this is a pretty clever idea. A mouse needs one hand to use and a keyboard needs two; there's no way to keep your hands in one area the whole time you use a computer without something like this.
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#7I agree this is a pretty clever idea. A mouse needs one hand to use and a keyboard needs two; there's no way to keep your hands in one area the whole time you use a computer without something like this.
What about trackpoints? That's one of the reasons why I keep buying thinkpads.
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Knnh_vIVgA4
The lack of precision reminds me of those crappy quality trackballs on miniature wireless keyboards.
Re: Cursor Control Without Lifting Hands from Keyboard
#9I agree this is a pretty clever idea. A mouse needs one hand to use and a keyboard needs two; there's no way to keep your hands in one area the whole time you use a computer without something like this.