Google AdSense leak?
11–20 of 176 posts
Re: Google AdSense leak?
#12I would be surprised though if anyone actually sought out to 'screw' the legitimate advertisers. It is after all Google's bread and butter.
Re: Google AdSense leak?
#13Re: Google AdSense leak?
#14Re: Google AdSense leak?
#15Let's think about this logically. Google takes 32% of every adsense click [1], so assuming an account makes $5,000/month, Google is making $2,352/month from that account. So by banning the account, they are making $5,000 one-time, and losing $2,352/month forever. No company is stupid enough to do that. However, considering a site making $5,000 or $10,000/month is generating quite a few clicks, I think it makes perfec…
Under this assumption banning a publisher would not diminish the revenue stream but just diverting the ads to other not yet banned publishers.
That doesn't mean the scheme as described is true, but it's not as obviously stupid as your first paragraph makes it seem.
Re: Google AdSense leak?
#16The paragraph on G analytics is also very interesting, it never seems to line up with other tracking tools like Piwik.
Re: Google AdSense leak?
#17Re: Google AdSense leak?
#18Let's think about this logically. Google takes 32% of every adsense click [1], so assuming an account makes $5,000/month, Google is making $2,352/month from that account. So by banning the account, they are making $5,000 one-time, and losing $2,352/month forever. No company is stupid enough to do that. However, considering a site making $5,000 or $10,000/month is generating quite a few clicks, I think it makes perfec…
The publisher (ie your website showing ads) isn't the one paying them that money; they aren't losing any recurring revenue by banning them.
Since they're Google AdSense, it's very likely that they have plenty of new signups to show those ads on.
Re: Google AdSense leak?
#19It seems a bit more realistic than hoping that they see this pastebin text, and decide to follow up on it, track you down, and get your statements on the record.