I changed the url from [1] to the article it cites, which is more substantive. But should we link to the actual paper [2] instead? 1. http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/04/21/303375... 2. http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5534
No, it's confusing enough already that this post is filled with obsolete NPR and NPR-quoting comments. (Though I appreciate that your change wasn't done invisibly!) I think it would be better to let someone submit the paper separately, or for us all to just upvote your comment.
Edit: Oops, version conflict. I was talking about a bit you edited out (about multiple links).