Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
1–10 of 69 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#2Since then, I've become a lot more realistic and use the diagrams when they're the best method of communicating a conceptual or concrete thought. I rarely use class diagrams, but I find myself using sequence diagrams and deployment diagrams a few times a month. Occasionally I also use Use-Case diagrams when there's more complexity than can be easily included in a single user story.
Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#3Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#4Being able to break down an interaction into a sequence diagram (especially between 2 or 3 servers) is a powerful thought tool for specifying interactions and its easy for people to understand.
Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#5Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#6Proof:
http://www.google.co.uk/trends/explore#q=%2Fm%2F07x3g&cmpt=q
Interesting though, Grady Booch - the man who wrote the Ada text book I had to learn for university - is behind UML. Glad it failed.
Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#7Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#8Re: Ask HN: Is UML still relevant today?
#9If you're asking about designing UML diagrams for tools that will automagically generate your application from diagrams, then I think that's definitely a different question. I haven't looked at what the current state of the code generation tools are, but when I looked at it several years ago, it didn't look very promising.