Live data from Hacker News

Results of the GitHub Investigation

github.com

1–10 of 514 posts

Re: Results of the GitHub Investigation

#5
post #4

>>the investigator did find evidence of mistakes and errors of judgment Isn't that like saying, well the hard proof isn't there but its clear you did do something wrong?

Which is an important distinction to make, especially considering the original allegations were specific.

Re: Results of the GitHub Investigation

#7
post #2

I don't even know what to make of this. They say there was no evidence but he is still resigning.

They say there was no evidence of gender-based harassment, but I don't see them claiming "there was no evidence of harassment" either. Don't know enough to pass judgement.

Re: Results of the GitHub Investigation

#8
> The investigation found no evidence to support the claims [...] of a sexist or hostile work environment.

So, are they saying that Horvath was lying? I mean, there was a lot of specific stuff she mentioned that seemed inappropriate. I don't want to get into whether the behavior was "sexist" or not, but I think we can all agree that if what she said was true, the work environment was hostile and unprofessional.

Re: Results of the GitHub Investigation

#9
post #2

I don't even know what to make of this. They say there was no evidence but he is still resigning.

It says there's no evidence of gender-based $BAD_THING, but not that no $BAD_THINGs happened.

One could argue that allowing a non-employee so much access to a private company is an 'error of judgement.' (Referring to Horvath's comments about Tom's wife)

Post reply on HN