Anything claiming to be "from the Bottom Up" and starting with Unix and Advanced C instead of Assembly cannot be taken serious.
Computer Science from the Bottom Up
11–20 of 46 posts
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#12Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#13We actually ended up starting at logic gates, flip-flops, and latches. But the joke was a great reminder that your floor is someone else's ceiling.
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#14I read through couple chapters and enjoyed it. Does anyone have suggestions on other books dealing with this level of complexity?
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#15I read through couple chapters and enjoyed it. Does anyone have suggestions on other books dealing with this level of complexity?
I haven't read any of the chapters of this, so my comparison may be a bit off, but you might check out The Elements Of Computing Systems[1]. It goes from logic gates to compilers. http://www.nand2tetris.org/book.php
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the intro: "Not everyone wants to attend shop class. Most people only want to drive the car, not know how to build one from scratch. Obviously any general computing curriculum has to take this into account else it won't be relevant to its students. So computer science is taught from the "top down"; applications, high level programming, software design and development theory, possibly data structures. Students wi…
Sure, but none of that has much to do with computer science. This should more accurately be called "bottom up Unix".
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#17I read through couple chapters and enjoyed it. Does anyone have suggestions on other books dealing with this level of complexity?
Here is the table of contents: http://www.amazon.com/review/R3K8J39AMWS64U/ref=cm_cr_dp_tit...
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#18I've started to do something quite similar on my blog. I've been mentoring some web developers who only know html+css, and i've been using the time to write about the whole stack.
My goal is to build a roadmap, not to write a recipe book.
I've just started, but this is going to be a very useful reference for when I need to explain some of the more complex ideas.
http://daemon.co.za/2014/04/introduction-fullstack-fundament...
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#19Would've been nice if there was some "Theoretical CS Bottom-Up" too. From what I see this book doesn't have anything about computability, complexity, automata, algorithms, data structures, etc. Those abstract math-ish parts of CS are often overlooked by hackers, and are quite beautiful IMO.
Re: Computer Science from the Bottom Up
#20This is a really useful resource. I've started to do something quite similar on my blog. I've been mentoring some web developers who only know html+css, and i've been using the time to write about the whole stack. My goal is to build a roadmap, not to write a recipe book. I've just started, but this is going to be a very useful reference for when I need to explain some of the more complex ideas. http://daemon.co.za/2…
I'm not going to get as much use from this as I thought at first glance =/
does anybody know of any other good references to point people to when discussing the basics?