Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 23 posts

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#11
post #2

"Build a tiny portion of the idea" Yes, this is the solution, the more you go with it the more you expand it. When it reach a certain level, it would be more interesting to VC and investors.

If no small portion of it is a good idea by itself, then I don't think it really is a good idea.

Not a good idea, or not a feasible idea? I can think of dozens of good ideas that cannot be reduced to some kind of minimal, doable project.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If no small portion of it is a good idea by itself, then I don't think it really is a good idea.

Not a good idea, or not a feasible idea? I can think of dozens of good ideas that cannot be reduced to some kind of minimal, doable project.

Or "not a feasible idea.. yet", I have some ideas which I definitely do not have the resources to pull off and don't know how to split into small chunks which I can, but I may well have the resources in a year or two, so it might be worth keeping them until then.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If no small portion of it is a good idea by itself, then I don't think it really is a good idea.

Not a good idea, or not a feasible idea? I can think of dozens of good ideas that cannot be reduced to some kind of minimal, doable project.

Well it all gets down to definitions and its more of a rule of thumb. However, I'm very suspicious of ideas that seem to be good only because the complexity gives them a certain gravitas. Its sort of a version or expansion (or misappropriation) of Gall's law:

“A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. The inverse proposition also appears to be true: A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be made to work. You have to start over, beginning with a working simple system.”

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#15
Write the idea down somewhere. However, ideas are a dime a dozen and are essentially useless unless you have a viable plan of attack. For instance, I would love to work on something world-changing like time-travel, teleportation, or anti-gravity, but there are currently no fruitful ways of even approaching those problems.

I had an advisor tell me that I should always be keeping several "big" problems on the backburners at all times, so that whenever I find out about a new technique or technology, I will be able to immediately think of ways to apply the new tools to the big problems. He said it will fail 99 percent of the time, but on the 1 percent of the time that it does work, everything will somehow fit together and with any luck, you will have found a viable approach.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#16
Years ago a good hacker friend of mine and I thought we would start writing down all the good ideas we had. We only wrote down the really good ones. After half a year we had more than 50 ideas that were all patentable, gamechanging or could make lots and lots of money. Some of them have later been implemented successfully by startups vouching for the fact they were indeed pretty good ideas. At least some of them :-)

We stopped because it became obvious to us that a binder (yes this was before computers were in wide use) full of great ideas is worth exactly nothing.

So what do I do when I come up with a great idea? I forget it as quickly as possible so I can concentrate on executing what I'm doing now.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#17
Good advice from the irrepressible Dijkstra on this matter: "Before embarking on an ambitious project, try to kill it." (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd10xx/EWD1055A.PDF)

If you try honestly and still fail to kill it completely, whatever's left that you can't kill because it seems doable right now is one way to go.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not a good idea, or not a feasible idea? I can think of dozens of good ideas that cannot be reduced to some kind of minimal, doable project.

Well it all gets down to definitions and its more of a rule of thumb. However, I'm very suspicious of ideas that seem to be good only because the complexity gives them a certain gravitas. Its sort of a version or expansion (or misappropriation) of Gall's law: “A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. The inverse proposition also appears to be true: A complex sy…

Please list a dozen. I like the challenge of attempting to break problems down into small parts. THx.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#19
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well it all gets down to definitions and its more of a rule of thumb. However, I'm very suspicious of ideas that seem to be good only because the complexity gives them a certain gravitas. Its sort of a version or expansion (or misappropriation) of Gall's law: “A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. The inverse proposition also appears to be true: A complex sy…

Please list a dozen. I like the challenge of attempting to break problems down into small parts. THx.

What less than a search engine can you build if you've got pagerank? in fact you can't even know if pagerank works unless you have a search engine.

Re: Ask HN: What do you do with big ideas?

#20
post #19
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please list a dozen. I like the challenge of attempting to break problems down into small parts. THx.

What less than a search engine can you build if you've got pagerank? in fact you can't even know if pagerank works unless you have a search engine.

Sure, but you don't need to index the entire internet to build PageRank; only a subset of pages that form a graph. And, it's pretty easy to break the notion of building a search engine into smaller, discrete steps-- hell, I'd imagine that it could be done by two Stanford grad students.
Post reply on HN