Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a horrible thing to say. No it's not. She's taking up resources ($500,000 of seed capital, and a spot on the New York Times) that someone else could have. People of substance, like me, are often out-competed in the race for resources (e.g. fundings) by douchebags like her of no merit, but with contacts. The more people like her fail, and preferably embarrassingly so, the sooner we can have a Flight to Substanc…
Would you say that to her face? Would you say that to anyone's face? Or is it just something you're willing to say from a comfortable distance on the internet, where you're not actually saying that about an actual human being, just about some kind of abstract, distant thing? You can express those feelings without being harsh, insulting, abrasive, etc. Take a chill pill and think about whether adding all this negativi…
It does add to the discussion. The strong language highlights the predatory behavior better than kind words would. OChurch is simply a few decades ahead of his time in the sort of business behavior he will tolerate. Its like if you went back to the 50's and started calling out the rampant sexism using today's language!