Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how two people producing the same output deserve different salaries based on where they live - why should geographic location dictate my salary relative to my peers?
Because "you" (the generic you--not necessarily you specifically) are usually willing to accept a different salary for a given job description based on where you lived based on a variety of factors: alternative opportunities, attractiveness of the area, cost of living (primarily housing), etc. And, in fact, jobs in higher cost of living areas (assuming equivalent jobs are actually available elsewhere) tend to not ful…
"One". Wish this was in more standard use.