11–20 of 29 posts
The hyperbole of this line demeans the whole article, 'one of this century’s biggest corporate disasters ' 14 years into the 21st Century? Come on.
The hyperbole of this line demeans the whole article, 'one of this century’s biggest corporate disasters ' 14 years into the 21st Century? Come on.
In any case, 86 years is a lot of years remaining for someone to do a worse job than BlackBerry.
Blackberry just doesn't have traction outside of the US, since most of the rest of the world deeply distrust the architecture of the Blackberry system (i.e. all data sent back to US-based servers). I think this is the one thing they must fix - the perception by the world that Blackberry is just a front for the CIA. Laugh all you want: I've heard this expressed in more than one location here in Europe, enough so that…
I found that funny because that's the exact opposite of what actually happened. BlackBerry was to secure and certain governments couldn't spy on their citizens. Here is an article from where this misinformation stemmed from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-10830485
I'm guessing people only read headlines and a lot of them had "BlackBerry" and "Security" in them and most people jumped to conclusions.
BlackBerry has many NOC's and not one is in the US.
Having an investment from a company like Blackberry may on the surface look just the same as any other investment. But in fact things are dramatically different. You may very well end up having your stock sold to the highest bidder at some future liquidation auction (there is a definitive chance of Blackberry ending like that) and then suddenly you find yourself with a new partner that you didn't choose. One that may…
Having an investment from a company like Blackberry may on the surface look just the same as any other investment. But in fact things are dramatically different. You may very well end up having your stock sold to the highest bidder at some future liquidation auction (there is a definitive chance of Blackberry ending like that) and then suddenly you find yourself with a new partner that you didn't choose. One that may…
The QNX kernel was released under open source in 2007. Not all other middleware is released though ...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The QNX kernel was released under open source in 2007. Not all other middleware is released though ...
Right, but it was closed again in 2010 and I'm not quite sure what the status is today but as far as I am aware you can not just go and fork it or even build it.
In that case, Wall Street is the problem.
The hyperbole of this line demeans the whole article, 'one of this century’s biggest corporate disasters ' 14 years into the 21st Century? Come on.
Blackberry just doesn't have traction outside of the US, since most of the rest of the world deeply distrust the architecture of the Blackberry system (i.e. all data sent back to US-based servers). I think this is the one thing they must fix - the perception by the world that Blackberry is just a front for the CIA. Laugh all you want: I've heard this expressed in more than one location here in Europe, enough so that…
Blackberry just doesn't have traction outside of the US, since most of the rest of the world deeply distrust the architecture of the Blackberry system (i.e. all data sent back to US-based servers). I think this is the one thing they must fix - the perception by the world that Blackberry is just a front for the CIA. Laugh all you want: I've heard this expressed in more than one location here in Europe, enough so that…
But it seems that they have a lot of marketing fails, that's only one of the more recent.