http://www.cmu.edu/homepage/society/2014/spring/google-vp-na...
Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
11–20 of 23 posts
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#12Anybody else think the header on this page is too big? If you scroll to the bottom and take the footer into account the content is almost restricted to 1/3 of the window.
ANY fixed paged header is too big. If it's a site I plan on revisiting, I'll modify CSS (Stylebot / Stylish plugins) to "position: static". If it's not, I'll simply set it to "display: none;" as I do with other page annoyances.
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#13Anybody else think the header on this page is too big? If you scroll to the bottom and take the footer into account the content is almost restricted to 1/3 of the window.
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#14Looks like a good choice, covering quite a few strengths. Unlike many "external" hires plucked from industry to lead university divisions (which doesn't always work out well), Moore is as much of a CMUer as a Googler: He was professor in the school he'll now be dean of from 1993 to 2006, and has maintained strong ties since, so is quite familiar with its culture and operation.
And from 2006 to present he worked (practically) next door to CMU at Google's Pittsburgh office, which was set up specifically to make and maintain close ties with the school.
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#15Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#16Anybody else think the header on this page is too big? If you scroll to the bottom and take the footer into account the content is almost restricted to 1/3 of the window.
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#17Moore gave us a very intuitive way to understand machine learning algorithms, and Mitchell gave us a more theoretical account. I remember working with Jon Huang on a Latent Dirichelet Allocation algorithm implementation for the final project. It was a lot of fun and very intense at the same time. Such great memories!
Moore have me an excellent foundation of concepts, and I'm really glad for CMU to have such a respectable figure back on campus.
I expect great things for CMU, especially Robotics and Machine Learning!
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#18Looks like a good choice, covering quite a few strengths. Unlike many "external" hires plucked from industry to lead university divisions (which doesn't always work out well), Moore is as much of a CMUer as a Googler: He was professor in the school he'll now be dean of from 1993 to 2006, and has maintained strong ties since, so is quite familiar with its culture and operation.
Doesn't CMU also have a campus or program in Silicon Valley?
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#19Looks like a good choice, covering quite a few strengths. Unlike many "external" hires plucked from industry to lead university divisions (which doesn't always work out well), Moore is as much of a CMUer as a Googler: He was professor in the school he'll now be dean of from 1993 to 2006, and has maintained strong ties since, so is quite familiar with its culture and operation.
Seems like a good move. It sends a signal that it's ok for faculty to work in industry. Probably a net benefit to the school, but perhaps may have some unintended consequences of faculty leaving too. Doesn't CMU also have a campus or program in Silicon Valley?
Re: Google VP named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science
#20Seriously, it's marketing snake oil and its creating wasteful barriers to entry for companies thinking of creating innovative user-friendly government software. And it can't die fast enough. I know its probably not high on this dean's priority list, but if I were a CMU student I'd be embarrassed that my university was associated a pseudo-serious institution that makes claims vastly exceeding what the scientific method can conclude given the data they present. The gap between their projected air of authority and their obliviousness to the limits of their methodology should make any engineer-oriented person uneasy. Yes there are probably some smart people in the SEI with interesting war stories and such but the whole certification thing has got to go.
Most of you in start-ups probably never heard of CMMI. This is generally a good thing.