The only "benefit" to this post is that the publicity given to the grievance (whether real or imagined) will sway Dropbox leadership to drop Condi. Whether that's a good thing or not for Dropbox as a business is not even considered. The content of the article has no real benefit to anyone.
Drop Dropbox
231–240 of 1001 posts
Re: Drop Dropbox
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope so. We're moving into a phase where there you can grab information about anything, from nearly anywhere, at almost any time. There is little advantage to decision making based on cemented ideals anymore. This new era has exposed the good and bad in all facets of life. It's no longer about republicans, or communists, or this, or that, it's just about life. I prefer to remain non-partisan and instead look at thi…
Situational morality is really not morality at all.
Re: Drop Dropbox
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the current, Democratic, administration hasn't exactly rolled back many of these changes, right? My point isn't to criticize the Obama administration, but rather ask: if Hillary Clinton was asked to serve on the board of $your_favorite_service, would you consider dropping that service?
You mean the current President that authorized the assassination of a U.S. citizen abroad?
Re: Drop Dropbox
#234It's cheap, it's renewable, and the Internet is producing more of it than we can handle.
If we could figure out how to power engines with Internet outrage, we'd solve all of our world's problems.
Right now it's mostly producing angry tweets and protest pages, but I'm sure if we work together we'll figure it out, eventually.
Until then, keep the outrage coming! I believe in outrage!
Re: Drop Dropbox
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
The bush admin asserted that it could detain anyone without a trial and torture them. You know, they were trying to do good. We should just let that slide.
Let's see, is that better or worse than a drone strike? I guess President Obama is trying to keep you alive so it's okay if he takes out a few miscreant citizens with drone strikes, right? (And this is why these discussions belong somewhere else, not on Hacker News)
Re: Drop Dropbox
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, since Condoleeza Rice seems to be the very definition of Thought Police. Her quest for ideological purity resulted in hundreds of thousands of people being killed or maimed.
[deleted]
Re: Drop Dropbox
#237When looking to grow our board, we sought out a leader who could help us expand our global footprint. Condoleezza sure left a global footprint in the Middle East alright. Hate do this Dropbox, but time for me to move on. Edit: Suggestions for a Dropbox substitute?
I've been running ownCloud[0] on my server. It has Windows/Linux/Mac/Android/iOS clients and has been working very well for me as a drop in Dropbox replacement. In addition to the clients, you can use webDAV to access your files. [0] http://www.owncloud.org
Re: Drop Dropbox
#238These witch hunts hurt a lot of people, much more than the single figurehead that everyone get all up in arms over.
Re: Drop Dropbox
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> advise on security matters and help keep the NSA out of my files What about her past makes you think she would have this position? I'd argue if the options are "Help protect your data from the NSA" or "Hand over your data to the NSA" that she would be much more in favor of giving your data to the NSA.
What about her past makes you think she would have this position?
Re: Drop Dropbox
#240I'm not American, so this is a little removed for me. In truth I don't really see big enough (non cosmetic) differences between the parties or administrations to justify the partisanship you guys seem to have. What bother me here is not Condoleezza Rice specifically. Every ranking official of any country (or company) owns a big share of that country's sins and there are no "clean" administrations. Complicity is the p…
> In truth I don't really see big enough (non cosmetic) differences between the parties or administrations to justify the partisanship you guys seem to have. Then you don't know American politics. How different might the country be had Gore been seated as President in 2001 after winning the election?