Live data from Hacker News

The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

opensignal.com

11–20 of 53 posts

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#11

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

> and removing functional/useful sensors.

Are temperature and humidity really that useful? I know many Android phones have had them, but have they really be used? Do they really add much to the device?

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#12

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

Temperature and humidity seem gimmicky to me (I don't care about atmospheric conditions in my pocket) while fingerprint and heart rate are at least potentially useful.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#13
post #11

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

> and removing functional/useful sensors. Are temperature and humidity really that useful? I know many Android phones have had them, but have they really be used? Do they really add much to the device?

to the individual they did not pose much benefit, but to society as a whole they were extremely useful. Through programs like pressureNET, literally opening up new avenues for data recording that never existed before.

In the short term these new sensors will provide more benefits to the consumer, but to the majority they will be something you use 1 or 2 times then forget about.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#14
post #11

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

> and removing functional/useful sensors. Are temperature and humidity really that useful? I know many Android phones have had them, but have they really be used? Do they really add much to the device?

Temperature would be extremely useful... if not for the fact that I typically store my cellphone millimeters away from my body.

If temperature were useful, then humidity would be as well because then you could calculate local humidex.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#15

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

I've never found a phone temp sensor to be useful, primarily because it tends to be several degrees higher than ambient due to internal components.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#16
post #9
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you give developers more tools, they surprise you with what they come up with. Consumers didn't say they wanted accelerometers, but once developers got ahold of them, they proved massively useful. If you give me a new sensor, I might not have any ideas on how to make it useful, but if one developer has one good idea, that benefits me.

Exactly correct! Google and Motorola put a barometer into the Xoom to test GPS altitude improvements, and it turned out that some developers (like me, and like the opensignal team) discovered that the sensor actually has world-changing potential in atmosphere modelling. Huge benefit from a simple sensor addition that didn't even really have a clear purpose at launch.

But then that goes back to funkyy's point: there may be lots of unexpected things developers can do with it, but none of them so far are things customers care about. Atmospheric modeling? Really cool! Do customers care? Heck no.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#18
I love how developers of this app allow themselves to collect numerous data about their users' phones, so much they even track their hardware, model numbers and available APIs. But the worst thing is probably that this has became so common that people don't react negatively anymore towards that kind of privacy violation.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#19

Well that's disappointing. Adding gimmicky(imo) sensors and removing functional/useful sensors. Obviously Samsung is thinking from a consumer prospective, but still very disappointing.

I've never found a phone temp sensor to be useful, primarily because it tends to be several degrees higher than ambient due to internal components.

I believe that monitoring internal components is exactly why temperature sensors are useful: the device can shut itself off it it becomes too hot. This can happen if the it has been left on the dashboard of a car during the summer, for example. This can help to lengthen the lifetime of the device.

Re: The Galaxy S5 does not have temperature or humidity sensors

#20
post #14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and removing functional/useful sensors. Are temperature and humidity really that useful? I know many Android phones have had them, but have they really be used? Do they really add much to the device?

Temperature would be extremely useful... if not for the fact that I typically store my cellphone millimeters away from my body. If temperature were useful, then humidity would be as well because then you could calculate local humidex.

It would have more to do with the temperature of the CPU and/or battery than anything dealing with the outside temperature.
Post reply on HN