If you want an alternative opinion from somebody who
1. Has taught a lot of Haskell
2. Thinks LYAH is better as a reference than a step-by-step method for learning Haskell
Then see my Learning Haskell gist here (it includes Haskell Fast & Hard, and other things too).
https://gist.github.com/bitemyapp/8739525
If anybody is learning Haskell and needs help, please email me.
Edit: I agree with nnq, I think LYAH moves too slowly and fails to show you what about Haskell is truly different and worthwhile in a compact enough format. That said, it is great as a reference as the explanations of concepts are stand-alone. (unlike RWH which is more project-oriented)
Edit2: You are going to feel a bit lost after Haskell Fast & Hard. This is natural. That's why I have you do the NICTA course. It firms things up.
Edit3: I think RWH is a great reference as well, but the mid-to-late chapters have a bit of an "in media res" thing going on because there are projects being walked through cross-chapter. That said, it has a very nice and simple example of, "pre-monads, ugly code; post-monads, pretty code". RWH also covers topics that you'll care about if you're doing Haskell in production.