Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple has made Darwin open source. That, WebKit, and LLVM are pretty core technologies. A good portion of their technology is open. So, it's not just using free software and not giving back.
Isn't WebKit a fork of GPLv2 code?
Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
271–280 of 459 posts
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#272Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the only thing apple has going for them is the iPhone, which is arguably a fad. The reason Rolex never goes out of style is because they never change their style, and apple is no Rolex like a lot of people seem to think. People easily forget about all the hype around the iMac g3. Sure, it changed the company, but they still have yet to over take windows. Now Android is out selling the i…
Apple isn't dominating any market. You're obviously going by the number of units sold, not the profit share. And you're not technically wrong. But isn't that a little bit like measuring the number of swings a baseball player takes instead of the number of times he gets a hit? In the PC market Apple is absolutely destroying all comers: 45% of the profit share in 2012. HP, Lenovo, Dell, Acer and Asus combine for the re…
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple isn't dominating any market. You're obviously going by the number of units sold, not the profit share. And you're not technically wrong. But isn't that a little bit like measuring the number of swings a baseball player takes instead of the number of times he gets a hit? In the PC market Apple is absolutely destroying all comers: 45% of the profit share in 2012. HP, Lenovo, Dell, Acer and Asus combine for the re…
Market share matters. Apple were doing well by profit share in the PC market in the early 1990s when they were as now a bigger company than MS. But because there were so many more PCs out there software developers and hardware manufacturers targeted MS not Apple and then when Apple machines were poor in the mid to late 1990s Apple almost disappeared. If Android is, say, 80%+ of the market at some point and it's no lo…
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#275Is this the 2014 edition of the Rotor Project[1], where Microsoft dumped a bunch of code to run .NET on XP/OSX/FreeBSD and then almost nothing happened? Hopefully the choice of a standard license this time will give this release a chance. [1] http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=1412...
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#276Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
They wrote the original C# compiler in a different language (probably C++) first. Then they wrote the second C# compiler in C#, and used the first compiler to compile the second compiler. Voila!
We regularly dogfood, so we're on like N iterations of your structure, but that's the idea!
This source release is so cool!
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#278Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it's particularly fair to lump Apple with the rest since 14 years later [1] the core OS is still open source [2], and they're actively working on several high profile open source projects (e.g. Webkit, CUPS, and clang). They're not exactly irrelevant either. [1] http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2000/04/05Apple-Releases-Dar... [2] http://opensource.apple.com/
Hate to burst your bubble, but the only thing apple has going for them is the iPhone, which is arguably a fad. The reason Rolex never goes out of style is because they never change their style, and apple is no Rolex like a lot of people seem to think. People easily forget about all the hype around the iMac g3. Sure, it changed the company, but they still have yet to over take windows. Now Android is out selling the i…
The thing you miss is that lot of people buy shit if it's cheap.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't speak for IntelliJ (can never get the damn thing configured correctly), but Eclipse's autocomplete leaves a lot to be desired. This may be configurable, but my experience has been that it's finicky about when it will trigger. I appreciate Eclipse's openness (and I tend to work with open source languages), but I must admit that purely examining the quality of the tool, Visual Studio is leagues ahead.
And Erich Gamma moved to MS three years ago...
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/azure-friday/erich-gamma-intr...
MP4 hotlink: http://media.ch9.ms/ch9/793e/d1b6ebda-d31b-413e-983e-1c698a8...