Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

roslyn.codeplex.com

111–120 of 459 posts

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#111
post #84
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... as awesome as this is, I'm gonna be That Guy: No WPF?

I thought WPF was killed during the whole mess of killing Silverlight, etc. a few years back?

No WPF is still there. XAML is still the basis for windows store apps, and windows phone apps.

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#112
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much of a hipster are you?

I'm a hipster because I like open source and want more not-open-source things to be open source?

No, you're a hipster because you seem to think nothing is truly open until it's on git.

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#114
post #83

They also announced as part of this that they are putting a large swatch of their .NET Source code under Apache 2 and accepting pull requests. Folks, this is a very big deal for Microsoft. Who would have imagined this 10 years ago? Here is an image that shows what they are putting into the community https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkT9oBcCQAAHIAV.jpg:large

Once again the whole KILL MONO FUD was the actions of the Open Source Community in the last 5 years. I never understood how in the world they got this is a trap from everything that was happening. I don't agree with RMS many times but in this one way he was 100% wrong when he targeted mono.

You honestly don't get it?

I really like microsoft products and I use them every day, however the business model is too lock people in to their ecosystem so that you have to purchase licenses for their products.

Mono clearly undermines that b/c it allows you to "easily" jump ship to a free platform.

Unless I'm somehow completely misunderstanding their business model - killing Mono just makes business sense.

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#116
post #25

Microsoft, you're seducing me again. I cheated on you with Ruby and Rails development a couple of years ago, but you're making me consider coming back in full swing. Competition is great for everybody and Microsoft is making all the right moves!

If you like Sinatra then check out Nancy.

For a compiled platform, nancy seems pretty slow http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#117
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a hipster because I like open source and want more not-open-source things to be open source?

No, you're a hipster because you seem to think nothing is truly open until it's on git.

Is Windows source available under a permissive license somewhere else? I'll take that.

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#118

Microsoft, you're seducing me again. I cheated on you with Ruby and Rails development a couple of years ago, but you're making me consider coming back in full swing. Competition is great for everybody and Microsoft is making all the right moves!

I spend a lot of time in many different languages, but right now I'm working on a personal project with C# MVC backend (API) and EmberJs on the front side. Great experience on both accounts!

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#119
post #111
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought WPF was killed during the whole mess of killing Silverlight, etc. a few years back?

No WPF is still there. XAML is still the basis for windows store apps, and windows phone apps.

One of two basis for Windows Store.

WinJS is the other.

Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler

#120
post #100

Microsoft uses Git. Is it not cool? Microsoft, please add unix terminal instead of start button in Windows 8.

Just use Powershell, or install Cygwin. What good is a unix terminal without a unix filesystem, anyway?

Or msysgit: git plus a very usable shell

http://msysgit.github.io/

Post reply on HN