Everyone on Roslyn is really excited about this and we hope that it serves as a signal that big things are happening in .NET to make the entire platform more open and agile! P.S. We're the Visual Basic compiler too :)
Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
61–70 of 459 posts
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#62Everyone on Roslyn is really excited about this and we hope that it serves as a signal that big things are happening in .NET to make the entire platform more open and agile! P.S. We're the Visual Basic compiler too :)
So does that mean one can reasonably expect to use official F# implementation(compiler, vm, libraries) in Linux within the coming months/years?
Lots of people use it
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#63Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a compiler. It takes input and produces output. There shouldn't be much in there that has any platform dependency.
For any compiler, platform-dependence of the compiler itself is strictly tied to platform-dependence of outputs. Edit: I confused roslyn with the recently announced AOT compiler.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#65Wow these contributions are a huge deal for Mono. I've spent the last few months making sure C# code works well in Mono and there are a lot of things that are missing or buggy. WebClient for example on Mono is missing DNS refresh timeout which means your app will never update a dns cache entry. If the ip of a server changes, you're pretty much screwed in Mono.
This doesn't solve your issue with WebClient. This is only a compiler and not runtime.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#66No more ".Net magic" now that the curtain's dropped. I think this will help .Net devs make smarter decisions about their code now that they can see what's happening in the background.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#67They also announced as part of this that they are putting a large swatch of their .NET Source code under Apache 2 and accepting pull requests. Folks, this is a very big deal for Microsoft. Who would have imagined this 10 years ago? Here is an image that shows what they are putting into the community https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkT9oBcCQAAHIAV.jpg:large
... as awesome as this is, I'm gonna be That Guy: No WPF?
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quite a lot of people actually. These moves have been on the cards for years. Just waiting now for the next big move in the coming months of when they acquire Xamarin.
I was hoping there would be an announcement at Build that they had acquired Xamarin, but that didn't happen. All that was mentioned was that they were a partner that they were working with. Still a possibility in the future though. The open sourcing of Roslyn can only mean good things for Xamarin.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#69Wow these contributions are a huge deal for Mono. I've spent the last few months making sure C# code works well in Mono and there are a lot of things that are missing or buggy. WebClient for example on Mono is missing DNS refresh timeout which means your app will never update a dns cache entry. If the ip of a server changes, you're pretty much screwed in Mono.
This doesn't solve your issue with WebClient. This is only a compiler and not runtime.
Re: Microsoft Open Sources C# Compiler
#70No more ".Net magic" now that the curtain's dropped. I think this will help .Net devs make smarter decisions about their code now that they can see what's happening in the background.
I'm not sure whether there ever was a time when .NET devs had to seriously consider "what was happening in the background". .NET Framework documentation has always been pretty good. Not too many dark corners there.