Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost everyone will have at least one completely up-to-date copy of their files. It's just a matter of signing up for a competing service and re-uploading. Four months seems like a long enough time to accomplish that.
It's not only about file storage. Ubuntu One offered a Web service to programmatically access the files. Imagine you've developed an application that interfaces with Ubuntu One and is mission critical for your business.
Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
141–150 of 209 posts
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#142I can see disabling new signups but not shutting the service down and erasing everyone's data - it doesn't bode well for Ubuntu in the enterprise or anywhere else trust and longevity are important.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why does PulseAudio have anything to do with Ubuntu? AFAIK, there is no relation between the two, other than the fact that Ubuntu offers PulseAudio (along with almost every other distro).
I must admit that, more than once, an Ubuntu upgrade killed my audio and I had to go and fix it myself. It's really painful that a distro that wants to be number 1 is so broken at times.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#144>Our strategic priority for Ubuntu is making the best converged operating system for phones, tablets, desktops and more
If Ubuntu One wasn't of their strategic priorities, then certainly they didn't have their priorities right.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#145I find the second paragraph disappointing, but unsurprising. "Our strategic priority for Ubuntu is making the best converged operating system for phones, tablets, desktops and more." My hope is that the next design fad that out-fads the current "make my 30 inch high-res monitor look like a 3 inch screen" fad will be a step back towards actual usability. Convergence is a usability nightmare. I'd rant more, but hey thi…
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#146To be honest. Ubuntu One never worked for me. Dropbox is a much better alternative. What are other alternatives to Ubuntu One? If they are smart, the partner with dropbox.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
Silver lining in the cloud (sorry could not resist) why don't you optimise for site deployment and then resell the service?
I'm thinking on that, not sure if it's worth it. Surely I will like to open source it, is just a 17Kb script that keeps listening and add a permission layer to create directories
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would but I love APT. I'll just stick to Debian Testing.
> I would but I love APT As a near 100% RHEL/Fedora user I am always wondering if there is anything but a material difference between apt and yum? From using Ubuntu extensively a few years ago they seem to have near identical feature set?
Atleast some of it is momentum from being first. APT was the main reason I jumped ship from Redhat, but that was before yum.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Proud custodians? Yes, they wrote the format and controlled it, but it was no different that a proprietary protocol; it was just a necessary way of allowing people to send data around. .DOC and .PSD in particular have always been proprietary messes that they wanted you to treat as a black box.
I was thinking more about OpenDocument, EPub, PNG. Things we take for granted today. It seems that once efforts transferred to the web companies simply have no desire to cooperate on their protocols. Even though cloud syncing is simple enough that dozens of companies have reinvented it, the companies don't feel any obligation (as I personally feel they have) to open up these protocols.
Even though cloud syncing is simple enough that dozens of companies have reinvented it, the companies don't feel any obligation (as I personally feel they have) to open up these protocols.
I agree, but I don't agree that they used to. Most formats were and have always been proprietary. Open formats are and were an exception, and they were poorly supported by the industry at large. Yeah, we had Open Document, but the biggest Office suit didn't support them.
Similarly, ownCloud has an open protocol for syncing, but most vendors don't support it, just like they didn't used to support open formats unless they were forced to by their popularity. It's nothing new.
Re: Shutting down Ubuntu One file services
#150That always seemed to me a bandwagon feature, like Microsoft's SkyDrive: they saw DropBox succeeding, they figured it would be easy to emulate, and they learned otherwise when they tried it. The only way this change affects me personally is that it gives me one less thing to go in and switch off when I install a new Ubuntu system, but I'm glad they've got a pragmatic attitude toward the possibility of spreading thems…
This is the first I'm hearing of Skydrive being considered a failure. What is that based on exactly?