Live data from Hacker News

Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

infoq.com

31–39 of 39 posts

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#31
post #29

Now definitively an April Fool's joke. Greg Stein's latest, and presumably last, comment on the JIRA ticket that started this furore: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7524?focusedComm... (ETA: they've also added "April Fools" to the title of the ticket itself.) Quoting: ---------------------------------------------------- Resolving as "Not a problem". We sure as hell don't want to do this. :-) My major tha…

At first I thought this was a serious thing even though I knew today is April 1st.

While I was believing the news, the second sentence caught my attention:

This will allow the development of the Subversion repository be developed with Git

O_o

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#32
post #31
post #29

Now definitively an April Fool's joke. Greg Stein's latest, and presumably last, comment on the JIRA ticket that started this furore: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7524?focusedComm... (ETA: they've also added "April Fools" to the title of the ticket itself.) Quoting: ---------------------------------------------------- Resolving as "Not a problem". We sure as hell don't want to do this. :-) My major tha…

At first I thought this was a serious thing even though I knew today is April 1st. While I was believing the news, the second sentence caught my attention: This will allow the development of the Subversion repository be developed with Git O_o

But that's already been possible for a good long while. They wouldn't be the first people to find git-svn to be a better front end to Subversion than the one that comes with Subversion itself :-).

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#34

Give it a year and the Apache Software Foundation's sites will be switching to nginx.

Full disclosure: I'm an ASF member and one of the httpd developers and PMC members. We're actually planning an experimental migration to nginx as part of Apachecon this coming weekend.

This has to be an April Fool's joke. Unless it's for legitimate competitive intelligence :-)

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#35
post #12

I'm kind of confused at the people who thought this was an April Fool joke. Really? If the announcement was on a news site or blog, maybe, but a 'Task' issue on the INFRA JIRA is hardly the appropriate venue. Although, it seems that @jimjag (the ASF director) was pretty pissed at the Subversion PMC and lead [1] for making the decision without consulting the community, just taking a vote from the committers. Note that…

Well this is embarrassing.

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#36

I really thought it was an April fools joke...

Given the competition between SVN and Git, this would be a very poor choice for an April fool's joke. You don't put out false information that makes you look like you're ceding to your chief competitor, when you're in the weaker position.

Yeah... that would be the most pointless April fool's joke ever started.

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#38
post #32
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At first I thought this was a serious thing even though I knew today is April 1st. While I was believing the news, the second sentence caught my attention: This will allow the development of the Subversion repository be developed with Git O_o

But that's already been possible for a good long while. They wouldn't be the first people to find git-svn to be a better front end to Subversion than the one that comes with Subversion itself :-).

Point is: if your mature project itself is a VCS, it sounds contradicting to use someone else's VCS to host your VCS :)

Re: Apache Subversion to Migrate to Git

#39
post #35
post #12

I'm kind of confused at the people who thought this was an April Fool joke. Really? If the announcement was on a news site or blog, maybe, but a 'Task' issue on the INFRA JIRA is hardly the appropriate venue. Although, it seems that @jimjag (the ASF director) was pretty pissed at the Subversion PMC and lead [1] for making the decision without consulting the community, just taking a vote from the committers. Note that…

Well this is embarrassing.

Isn't it? But, well played to the Subversion guys, et al. Was absolutely taken in... ;)
Post reply on HN