Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

blogs.msdn.com

21–30 of 149 posts

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#21
Steve Martin comes off as oddly defensive when announcing these changes

  I’ve yet to meet a developer who travels just to hear about pricing updates,
  so you won’t see us take the stage at Build and use the opening moment 
  to announce a price cut. This isn’t retail; innovation matters. 
  I’ll cover pricing right here, right now.
I'm not sure what purpose it serves except for making a stab at Amazon and Google.

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#22
post #13

Yet another example of competition working out well for the consumer. Innovation, price drops, etc. Can you imagine a world where consumer broadband had the same level of competition? Sigh...a nerd can dream...

> Can you imagine a world where consumer broadband had the same level of competition? Sigh...a nerd can dream...

Yes, in most European countries. :)

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#23

I am a Microsoft fan, but they are doing the cloud all wrong. To setup Azure, you have to use silverlight. To access the servers, you use remote desktop. Microsoft office 365 is $100 PER YEAR - much more than I would pay for the full suite (over 4years of average use) If you want to use SQL server, expect to pay $$$ - and integration or reporting services are not included. There is another feature that is actually ni…

>To access the servers, you use remote desktop.

Same exact thing on Rackspace for Windows instances. So what?

>Microsoft Office 365 is $100 PER YEAR much more than I would pay for the full suite

Huh? It can be used on up to 5 machines by, yes, 5 different users.

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#25
post #17
post #11

Hate on Microsoft all you want but this is a great thing. If Microsoft feels they want to play in the infrastructure as a service game they need to earn the customer's trust. Price matching is certainly one way to do it. Azure does run linux by the way (a lot of people don't know that). One thing I've been going back and forth about is whether I "trust" Google App Engine or Microsoft Azure more. Both are juggernauts…

Also with Bizspark you can have, if I remember well, like 150E/month to spend on azure for 3 years. Considering that almost any IT startup can access to bizspark, it is a nice thing to at least try it. Also I love the fact they are distributing their sdks for other os (linux and osx) and that they are all opensource on github

It's also worth pointing out that BizSpark imposes no requirements or obligations on the startup. You are free to join BizSpark and never use any of its services and you don't owe MS anything at all.

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#26

I've used Azure's cloud hosting in production for a half dozen sites and I have to say it's driving me nuts. We tried to flip DNS to Azure and it wouldn't resolve. It took our senior developer two days of talking to Azure support to solve. Ended up being their fault. Today I ported some work using PHP's mail() function, which evidently Azure doesn't support? This is probably our own fault for switching environments b…

I've had some issues with Azure too and have fought it a bit. My app is Node/Postgres based. I'm pretty positive if I had developed a C#/SQL Server app, then Azure would be almost entirely smooth sailing. I can't really blame MS for targeting their own tech first. Node, PHP and the like are not quite as first class citizens in Azure yet.

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#27
post #22
post #13

Yet another example of competition working out well for the consumer. Innovation, price drops, etc. Can you imagine a world where consumer broadband had the same level of competition? Sigh...a nerd can dream...

> Can you imagine a world where consumer broadband had the same level of competition? Sigh...a nerd can dream... Yes, in most European countries. :)

Well that's disappointing then. I wasn't particularly impressed with the service I got at my various hosts' homes in the UK. Is it really the case that the last mile physical infrastructure is considered common there so any provider can use it?

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#29
post #13

Yet another example of competition working out well for the consumer. Innovation, price drops, etc. Can you imagine a world where consumer broadband had the same level of competition? Sigh...a nerd can dream...

Google is hopefully going to fill the fiber internet gap. It's interesting to see Time Warner and AT&T scramble to put out their own "gigabit" services, after Google announces coming to Austin.

Re: Microsoft Azure: Cutting prices on compute and storage

#30
I don't understand why Microsoft doesn't drastically reduce the price of their Windows instances.

Microsoft is matching all of AWS prices, which means the Windows servers are more expensive than the Linux servers. Why not set your Windows server prices as the same as your Linux servers since you don't have to pay the licensing to yourself. This would make azure the easy choice for those running Windows servers.

Maybe I'm missing some anti-competition law here or something, but it sounds funny that Microsoft is price matching Amazon's prices on Microsoft Windows Servers.

Post reply on HN