Live data from Hacker News

Good Samaritan Backfire

medium.com

61–70 of 137 posts

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By his own account, he was ignoring police officers while interfering with their work at the scene of an accident. You can't do that and expect to not get physically removed.

Even then, that still doesn't necessitate violence and solitary confinement. Stop making excuses for bad behavior!

I'm not talking about the violence and solitary confinement, I'm talking about the use of physical force and subsequent arrest.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. As a police officer, you must be fair and law-abiding. Why must they be kind and polite?

Because one of the key challenges of law enforcement is securing community cooperation. Law enforcement cannot be effective when hey are seen by the community as a hostile gang of thugs, and politeness is just a name for adherence to social standards than signal that you are part of the community and not a hostile outsider.

Sometimes, yes. Other times, such as when a robbery is in progress, or when an accident has just occurred and you've arrived on the scene, polite and kind aren't very important.

Fair and law-abiding become much more important in these situations. Once the danger has passed, kind and polite can be important again.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#63
post #18

Sadly, I have many friends with similar stories from police departments in different places. I attribute the officer's behavior to constantly being surrounded by violence. If everyday, most people around you are violent unreasonable delinquents that want to hurt you, then you start developing personality characteristics to compensate and survive that environment. Add to this the types of personalities that are attrac…

Problem is, the advice to minimize interaction with the police, while sensible for the individual, exacerbates exactly the problem you are describing: that the police live in a bubble which distorts their perceptions.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#64
post #8

The HN lens has certainly been showing the US police force in a bad light over the last year or so. What are the origins of this strange behaviour? Why is force regularly used against people that verbally query the police? Even the army is trained to use dialogue where possible. It does sound like cameras will help but surely good and regular training programs should encourage good engagement with citizens.

"What are the origins of this strange behaviour?" It's not strange behavior. It's just that wealthy, white people are discovering what poor people and minorities have known for a long time: the police are not their friend, are not accountable to them, and are prone to violent overreaction. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

>> are prone to violent overreaction.

That's not true of every country though, it's certainly not the case in the UK. Here the police do act as your friends, they make a lot of effort to talk to the general public, both on the beat and at events. Certainly every encounter I've had with the police has been positive, even when I've been in the wrong (speeding or whatever). Police can be your friend, they can be accountable and they certainly don't need to be prone to violent outbursts.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#65
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Police in the U.S. are in no sense surrounded by violence. The United States in 2014 is one of the safest, least dangerous societies the universe has ever known.

American cities are the most dangerous in the developed world, by a large margin.

Only certain parts of certain cities[0]. It's almost entirely a result of the War On Drugs. In areas where drugs and gangs are a problem, the homicide rate is very high. In wealthy/safe parts of town, violent crime is not dramatically higher than the rest of the developed world.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chicago_violent_crime_map_...

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#66
post #43
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What was nonsensical about their request?

Right. Anybody who's been a first responder will recognize the importance of the request.

I see where you're coming from. Perhaps I should have said "seemingly nonsensical" (I'm sure the bystanders think they're being helpful). The point doesn't change in the slightest.

Correct response: "You've done good, but it's time to let the EMTs take things from here."

Incorrect response: "Move to the other side of the street. [Arrest for hesitation.]"

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#67
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Replying to facts with your own opinion isn't real useful.

>> But there's also the fact that American cities are war zones. That's an opinion claiming to be a fact.

Absolutely true. But there are other supporting facts in there even though the conclusion might be bananas. :)

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He reports doing plenty that would unreasonably "justify" the response he received. The causal void that you object to (which would shed doubt on his story) simply doesn't exist.

>He reports doing plenty I'm not sure how essentially "hanging around" justifies violent treatment, solitary confinement, etc. Perhaps you could explain?

He admits to hesitating to follow an order, talking back, etc. These do not logically, morally, or legally justify his treatment but they certainly explain why it happened.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By his own account, he was ignoring police officers while interfering with their work at the scene of an accident. You can't do that and expect to not get physically removed.

Even then, that still doesn't necessitate violence and solitary confinement. Stop making excuses for bad behavior!

The point when he was in handcuffs on the ground would have been where he should have waited the situation out kept quiet and not talk to officers "how he appreciates their service." or enquire if their actions where "standard protocol". That is just asking for trouble.

Re: Good Samaritan Backfire

#70
This is obnoxious. Dude did not need to be put in solitary, but he also didn't need to stay 15 feet from an accident scene that involved police and EMTs, how is he helping anything? He hurt his elbow recently so he had to stay involved at 1 AM?

And for real, what do you expect riding on handlebars in the city at 12:30? Sounds like a great, sober idea!

Post reply on HN