Live data from Hacker News

Who Needs a Boss?

nytimes.com

81–83 of 83 posts

Re: Who Needs a Boss?

#81
post #46

Without someone to have all the ideas, how could I build anything? It's a question for the ages Answer: the boss isn't for the employee, the boss is for the people who are spending the money on employees they don't trust. Putting in a boss is the first of many measures to protect capital. Most of these measures are very flawed. But even in a cooperative scenario, protecting capital is still a concern because an emplo…

My "boss" (Tech Manager, really) is there to take care of the things that would be a waste of my time... * Sitting in on meetings of things that might be, and calling me in when he feels my input would be useful * Being a first point of contact for the "customer" when they want to find something out but don't want to poke dev directly (they do poke me directly on occasion when they know it's appropriate) * Being a fi…

Do any of those things really require the person to be hierarchically above you though?

I'm all for AA's, and I see the value of managers, but is it not possible to have a structure where they have some power where required, but not so much that they basically 'own' you (as is usually the case)?

I'd love to work in a place where managers are not formally 'in charge', but mostly serve the purposes you describe. I might be missing something though, so I'd love to hear arguments why this is not done or not possible.

Re: Who Needs a Boss?

#82
This is not a new thing, Yugoslavia had something similar some 30-40 years ago, it was called self-governing socialism. The difference is it was forced by government and it was the only form of ownership, there were no private companies, all of them were self-governed. It works if you have a small company but it didn't show so well in companies with few hundred workers.

Re: Who Needs a Boss?

#83
post #51
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Owner-owned corporations are the kind of Feudalism that a capitalist can really get behind.

"Owner-owned corporations" are the kind of construction that a tautologist can really get behind.

Well, I was going for a stress on words, rather than a logical statement. But, I upvoted you because I like tautologies!
Post reply on HN