Live data from Hacker News

Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

googlecloudplatform.blogspot.com

31–40 of 223 posts

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#32

For anyone planning to use google cloud storage as an s3/cloudfront alternative to host public content, pay close attention to request pricing. Retrieving an object through its HTTP url is considered a class B XML request type by Google Cloud Storage. That is 1.3x - 2.5x times more expensive than cloudfront and s3 respectively.

I don't understand why people expose files they expect to receive significant traffic on public buckets, instead of using a caching reverse proxy from somewhere with cheaper data transfer rates.

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#35
The Google Storage pricing of $0.026/GB (or $0.020/GB for reduced durability) made my jaw drop.

I spend over $6k/month on Amazon S3, and this pricing from Google has me flabbergasted. Our architecture just uses S3 as a pluggable commodity, so a few hours of coding is going to result in a new $4000/month in savings from this announcement. Wow!

Edit: misplaced decimal!

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#36
post #20
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Moore's law doesn't say shit about storage.

>Moore's law doesn't say shit about storage. Yes, the cost progression of storage is expressed by Kryder's law, and is actually faster than moore's law. (well, in terms of storage space, not storage speed.) Of course, both are observations and not true laws; things will get interesting if/when the capital and power required per unit compute (or per unit ram or storage) stops dropping. But, my point is that in the pas…

Check out Kryder's Law for Storage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Kryder

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#37
post #32

For anyone planning to use google cloud storage as an s3/cloudfront alternative to host public content, pay close attention to request pricing. Retrieving an object through its HTTP url is considered a class B XML request type by Google Cloud Storage. That is 1.3x - 2.5x times more expensive than cloudfront and s3 respectively.

I don't understand why people expose files they expect to receive significant traffic on public buckets, instead of using a caching reverse proxy from somewhere with cheaper data transfer rates.

That's another point of failure. One of the use cases of cloud storage is serving static assets. "a developer could store and host media and other static assets for a web game in Google Cloud Storage". https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/faq#services

Due to their request pricing, serving static assets is significantly costlier than cloudfront since storage costs tend to be minimal

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#39
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does losing > $100e6 per year result in "amassing a big war chest"?

Raising a $250MM IPO is amassing a war chest. If that becomes harder, they become less competitive.

They're not competitive right now, from the sounds of it - they're losing a lot of money, very fast.

Re: Google Announces Massive Price Drops for Cloud Computing Services, Storage

#40

The Google Storage pricing of $0.026/GB (or $0.020/GB for reduced durability) made my jaw drop. I spend over $6k/month on Amazon S3, and this pricing from Google has me flabbergasted. Our architecture just uses S3 as a pluggable commodity, so a few hours of coding is going to result in a new $4000/month in savings from this announcement. Wow! Edit: misplaced decimal!

The new price sheets are below. It's 0.026/GB and 0.020/GB. Let your jaw drop more :)

GCS pricing - https://developers.google.com/storage/pricing GCE pricing - https://developers.google.com/compute/pricing

Post reply on HN