Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like my questions weren't arguments? I thought you saying that knowledge was timeless was related to older people (the topic) having knowledge. A person may understand principles but if they are not wiling to learn what a company wants they won't be hire able - do you disagree with that too? I'm trying to understand exactly what on topic (you arguing that ageism is real but not explaining why people would possib…
You conflated statements. You were (and still are) putting words in my mouth. This statement [of mine] : > Application level tools do change quite fast. The fundamentals of technology do not. Was in response to your blanket assertion that technology changes so fast current knowledge will be useless in 15 years. I believe this claim to be false, and provided evidence to that effect. You then claimed I had claimed this…
What I meant was that some of what is useful now won't be useful in years to come not absolutely all technology ever. Some people choose to specialize in company specific technology which wouldn't be at all useful outside of it.