Live data from Hacker News

Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

en.wikisource.org

261–270 of 276 posts

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#261
post #260

The modern business world is full of people like the author. People who are asleep. People who are not actually alive. People who are threatened by those who think. These people hate the thinker, but their dreary little lives rest directly on the foundation that the thinkers provide. For example, the radical who first looked at fire and thought, "hey, maybe I could use that".... now THAT GUY was a visionary who puts…

That being said... his business advice on who to hire is probably very apt.

A predictable machine is more useful to you than an unpredictable human.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#262
post #218
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The value of any given idea is really low I would agree if you mean average idea. Really great ideas are rare, difficult, and can change the world. The people who come up with those are rather special. And, unfortunately, rare, and almost never (in my somewhat limited experience) think of themselves as 'idea guys.' But this hivemind (nicely crurated by VCs- think that through) that ideas are worthless is very wrong.…

Yeah I mean "If I am operating a business and someone brings an idea for something we should do inside that business, the expected value of that idea is close to 0, and for some business it may be negative". That doesnt say that all ideas are useless. Huge businesses are built off of ideas all the time. Whether it be by accidental timing, cutting edge research, new synergy opportunities or actively spotting a hole th…

Agreed.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#263
post #219
post #198

It's sad how this sounds so plausible and valid... because even today, we are incredibly bad at managing (or making use of or integrating into a team...) brilliant people and we fail to make use of them and we let them fail because we can only figure out how to make reliable profit by using readily available mediocrity. We should instead learn to recognize human diversity and accept that besides the "well rounded har…

See this Charlie Rose interview with Jim Collins on his new book, Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck -- Why Some Thrive Despite Them All , where Jim talks about what it takes for a genius/artist to thrive ( http://www.hulu.com/watch/298461 ). Maybe these "always starters" and "distracted geniuses" are in search for truth and purity -- for meaning -- and are continuously iterating on and refining their valu…

Your second paragraph said it. The brilliant men don't slave for others, they have their own thing to find or follow.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#265
post #215
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of people want to be "the idea guy", because it's cool and relatively easy. The problem is that ideas are cheap. The value of any given idea is really low - I would argue that for many organisations ideas even have a negative value on average, because you are going to spend a lot of time dealing with the idea without it actually becoming something that generate value in the end. Even if you have an idea, that w…

The value of any given idea is really low I would agree if you mean average idea. Really great ideas are rare, difficult, and can change the world. The people who come up with those are rather special. And, unfortunately, rare, and almost never (in my somewhat limited experience) think of themselves as 'idea guys.' But this hivemind (nicely crurated by VCs- think that through) that ideas are worthless is very wrong.…

http://sivers.org/multiply

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#266
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The value of any given idea is really low I would agree if you mean average idea. Really great ideas are rare, difficult, and can change the world. The people who come up with those are rather special. And, unfortunately, rare, and almost never (in my somewhat limited experience) think of themselves as 'idea guys.' But this hivemind (nicely crurated by VCs- think that through) that ideas are worthless is very wrong.…

http://sivers.org/multiply

And execution is (therefore) "just" a multiplier of ideas.

You definitely need both.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#267
I like this article.

Something to remember, is you can never finish more things then you start by definition.

I would not like to hire someone who always finished everything regardless of how mistaken they were when they started.

We will we all finish fewer things then we start. By itself it't not that useful of a metric.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#268
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Employees still optimize for pay / effort, NOT absolute pay. In that respect, commissions are still FAR from perfectly aligning incentives. You can't really be suggesting that commissions are the silver bullet for aligning incentives, as if that hasn't been tried for thousands of years already, with very mixed success :)

If it is far from perfect, you can define perfect?

Fantasy.

Re: Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men (1924)

#269
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really great ideas also have low value. Even the most brilliant idea will have been had by countless people before it is known to the world. The truly rare, difficult and world-changing is the realization (production, enactment, what have you) of a really great idea, and the luck of that realization occurring in the right context.

>Even the most brilliant idea will have been had by countless people It wasn't very brilliant then, was it?

brilliant != unique
Post reply on HN