What You Can't Say (2004)
paulgraham.com
What You Can't Say (2004)
1–10 of 308 posts
Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#2Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#3Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#4Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#5Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#6tlwrl; Now that pg has more time to dive into the meta-er layers, guess we'll see some progress with the Arc language.
Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#7If you believe everything you're supposed to now, how can you be sure you wouldn't also have believed everything you were supposed to if you had grown up among the plantation owners of the pre-Civil War South, or in Germany in the 1930s-- or among the Mongols in 1200, for that matter? Odds are you would have.
This is lost on most people. You'll just hear "of course it was wrong!" and this point won't be given further thought.
But if it was obvious that it was wrong, why did masses of people agree to this? They wouldn't have done it if they also saw it as wrong.
So why are we the exception today? Couldn't we be just as gullible or misguided? You have to move your own ego and preconceived notions aside to seriously address the question.
Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#8Do you think you'll raise your children to believe in Santa, HN?
Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#9tlwrl; Now that pg has more time to dive into the meta-er layers, guess we'll see some progress with the Arc language.
This article was published in 2004.
If anything the explosion of ubiquitous and instantaneous social media has only exacerbated the tendencies towards branding unorthodox thinking as Thoughtcrime as a twittermob of snark and hatred can be summoned in hours if not minutes.
Re: What You Can't Say (2004)
#10Do you think you'll raise your children to believe in Santa, HN?
EDIT: personally I never asked about it because I didn't want to risk stopping the gifts.