Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

blogs.wsj.com

11–20 of 158 posts

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#11
The AI winter is very much over, and we're back to the good old days of selling the future. I bet this team is very sharp, but there's still merit to "over-promise, under-deliver."

"Phoenix, the co-founder, says Vicarious aims beyond image recognition. He said the next milestone will be creating a computer that can understand not just shapes and objects, but the textures associated with them. For example, a computer might understand “chair.” It might also comprehend “ice.” Vicarious wants to create a computer that will understand a request like “show me a chair made of ice.”

Phoenix hopes that, eventually, Vicarious’s computers will learn to how to cure diseases, create cheap, renewable energy, and perform the jobs that employ most human beings. “We tell investors that right now, human beings are doing a lot of things that computers should be able to do,” he says."

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#12

This fits Elon Musk's vision. He had 3 main and 2 smaller things that in the future will most affect the future of humanity. Main: the Internet, the transition to a sustainable energy economy, and space exploration, particularly extension of life to multiple planets Smaller: artificial intelligence and biology

Yup he put his $ where his mouth was, he invested in all 5 (for biology he invested in halcyon molecular, which shut down a year back)

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#13
Have we cracked the brain's "programming language" yet? I am affraid that until now research has been focused on the biological side of it; and it makes more sense to me to replicate the logic instead of replicating the brain's biological structure.

I believe that dataflow/reactive programming is the answer and the direction to follow as its principles are pretty close to how neurons work; plus it can be made to work on top of von neuman architectures.

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#16
"Phoenix hopes that, eventually, Vicarious’s computers will learn to how to cure diseases, create cheap, renewable energy, and perform the jobs that employ most human beings."

This line made me laugh. Which of the three goals is the most likely and desired outcome? (I'll give you a hint, it isnt curing diseases or finding energy)

That's like saying: 'my robots will cure cancer, bring world peace and replace most manual human jobs.'

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#17

When Zuckerberg and Ashton Kutcher invest in things, it doesn't really grab my attention. But when Musk does, it really does sound promising. The company's tech sounds really awesome, being able to perceive texture from photos and interpret objects from it would be so useful in so many real world applications.

Agreed on watching what Musk does. He seems to have a knack for brazenly pushing the technological envelope.

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#18
post #11

The AI winter is very much over, and we're back to the good old days of selling the future. I bet this team is very sharp, but there's still merit to "over-promise, under-deliver." "Phoenix, the co-founder, says Vicarious aims beyond image recognition. He said the next milestone will be creating a computer that can understand not just shapes and objects, but the textures associated with them. For example, a computer…

Funny to think that instead of curing diseases or making cheap renewable energy, we'd instead try to spend resources to invent a computer to do that for us...

Re: Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious

#20
post #13

Have we cracked the brain's "programming language" yet? I am affraid that until now research has been focused on the biological side of it; and it makes more sense to me to replicate the logic instead of replicating the brain's biological structure. I believe that dataflow/reactive programming is the answer and the direction to follow as its principles are pretty close to how neurons work; plus it can be made to work…

the brain having a programming language would have to be based on a lot of assumptions that not everyone is willing to make.
Post reply on HN