Live data from Hacker News

Moto 360

moto360.motorola.com

101–110 of 424 posts

Re: Moto 360

#101
post #66
post #2

Really cool stuff! From what it looks like this is a big departure from the previous Android smart watches that look like they jammed Android 1.0 on there. Two big concerns for me: 1) Battery life 2) Display visibility They go hand-in-hand for me. Get that nice high-res display but will it last me a day? For battery life it would be nice to have induction charging if it were to last about 8 hours (my personal guess).

If they price this to compete with typical mid-high watches, then you're looking at about $4000 [1] which is more than enough to get some very impressive display technology in there. If they skimp and try to put in cheap hardware and go for a $500 price target then this is going to fall flat. Hopefully they understand the watch market and know to charge more and put in the best materiel, but knowing the tech industry…

$4000 is insane for a piece of consumer electronics OR a watch. A watch that expensive is purely status-indicating jewelry.

If all you want to do is tell the time quickly, a $10 quartz watch does the job just fine.

I am sure Vertu or some other ridiculous company will sell you your insane diamond-encrusted titanium penis size signifier with a touch screen and Android Wear integration, but it won't be any more functional than the regular version.

Re: Moto 360

#102
Its a little strange that all of the promo pictures on the site are of male arms. I wonder if it was on oversight or if they really are only going after a male demographic.

Re: Moto 360

#104
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's still "simulated" which means Photoshopped / After Effects. I"m actually pretty nervous because there's no "simulated" disclaimer, yet these mock-ups are terribly rough: - fake / inconsistent lighting accents & bevel - screens in the photos are pixelated (looks like a screen-res quality source was rotated), yet the 3D model's screen is totally smooth suggesting 400 dpi or better - clip rotation angles are off -…

In other words, you can tell by some of the pixels?

A+, didn't think I'd see this reference on HN :)

Re: Moto 360

#105
post #66
post #2

Really cool stuff! From what it looks like this is a big departure from the previous Android smart watches that look like they jammed Android 1.0 on there. Two big concerns for me: 1) Battery life 2) Display visibility They go hand-in-hand for me. Get that nice high-res display but will it last me a day? For battery life it would be nice to have induction charging if it were to last about 8 hours (my personal guess).

If they price this to compete with typical mid-high watches, then you're looking at about $4000 [1] which is more than enough to get some very impressive display technology in there. If they skimp and try to put in cheap hardware and go for a $500 price target then this is going to fall flat. Hopefully they understand the watch market and know to charge more and put in the best materiel, but knowing the tech industry…

I can't imagine anyone releasing any sort of smart watch that breaks the $1000 barrier. I think that sub $500 is probably necessary to get any kind of traction at all.

Re: Moto 360

#107
post #60

That stem is interesting. The Pebble has 4 buttons, which are generally mapped to up, down, select, and back. That strikes me as the minimum for useful app interface. With the Moto 360's stem I can see getting up down and select, but now how they'd do back. Maybe a long-press?

Not really input related, but is it remotely plausible that winding could charge the battery?

Absolutely not.

  1. The dynamo would take up too much room
  2. Pinching a tiny metal shaft is ergonomically awful
  3. have you seen the tiny wind-up flashlights?  they're huge, and they require quite a lot of winding, and that's just to power an LED for a few minutes.
  4. groundbreaking features like a wind-up piece of personal electronics, are *flagship* features.  If this thing had a 1 week battery, or was windup, or whatever, that would be a *very high visibility* part of the ad campaign.

Re: Moto 360

#108
post #2

Really cool stuff! From what it looks like this is a big departure from the previous Android smart watches that look like they jammed Android 1.0 on there. Two big concerns for me: 1) Battery life 2) Display visibility They go hand-in-hand for me. Get that nice high-res display but will it last me a day? For battery life it would be nice to have induction charging if it were to last about 8 hours (my personal guess).

Maybe it's a color e-ink display...?

No, that would be an incredible, revolutionary, first-of-its kind feature. You'd see it trumpeted all over every single piece of concept art and advertising. There's absolutely zero chance that the first color e-ink display would be a stealth feature only shown off at launch.

Re: Moto 360

#109
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plenty of mass-market devices with round screen. Heres a 3+ year old Garmin watch with touch and pixel-based round screen: http://www.dcrainmaker.com/images/2011/04/IMG_0486A-720x479....

Based on the size of the bezel couldn't that still be a rectangular lcd? I tried finding pictures of the internals of that watch, but my google-fu is not strong enough.

I have one (well, two at one point). The LCD is rectangular in a round bezel.

Re: Moto 360

#110
post #103

Seriously... It looks like a toy comparing to a good old swiss watch : http://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/bond

And Omega is to Swiss watches what Lindsey Lohan is to acting =)

* I'm Swiss and this comment was made in good humour

Post reply on HN