Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#2Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#3The bolding of search terms sure seems like it would be a good idea, but it is very distracting to me.
Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#4Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#5Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#6Underlined links are discoverable -- it's obvious at a glance that they are links, rather than body text.
Underlined links are noticeable -- they stand out from a sea of non-underlined text, drawing the eye to them.
Underlined links are self-explanatory -- it's obvious what you're supposed to do with them (i.e. click).
These are all valuable UI benefits.
The solutions that most sites that have abandoned underlined links have taken up in their place all have drawbacks compared to the good old underline:
Underlining the link on hover/rollover reduces discoverability -- you don't know for certain whether something's a link or not until you investigate it.
Making links a different color reduces usability for the color-blind; red-blind people have no idea that your red links look different than your black text does.
Making links bold, italic, or a different size all leave the possibility of confusing the link with body text that happens to share the same typographical presentation. (You can underline text too, of course, but that's relatively rare on the Web because of the strong association of underlining with links.)
Nobody cares about this argument anymore, I know, so I don't expect anything to change because of it. I just think it's worth noting that there are good reasons to prefer underlining links that don't boil down to "stuck in 1996".
Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#7I know the graphic designers have long since won this battle, but I still feel like there's value in underlining links. Underlined links are discoverable -- it's obvious at a glance that they are links, rather than body text. Underlined links are noticeable -- they stand out from a sea of non-underlined text, drawing the eye to them. Underlined links are self-explanatory -- it's obvious what you're supposed to do wit…
For a list of search results where you know every entry is a hyperlink? Pure visual noise and I'm glad it's gone.
Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#8Re: Google’s Search Results Ditch Underlined Links, Increase Font Size
#9I know the graphic designers have long since won this battle, but I still feel like there's value in underlining links. Underlined links are discoverable -- it's obvious at a glance that they are links, rather than body text. Underlined links are noticeable -- they stand out from a sea of non-underlined text, drawing the eye to them. Underlined links are self-explanatory -- it's obvious what you're supposed to do wit…
I have some slight equivocation with myself over the above, after having written it; since it seems to lead the question "isn't almost everything just iterating until a breakthrough", but to be pragmatic, I have to draw a line somewhere before I start shaving yaks, and perpetually tweaking how I look at "THIS REFERS TO SOMETHING SOMEWHERE ELSE" seems to be getting quite four legged and fuzzy, so I'll leave it in.
(to be more productive about this all, if a UI designer wants to try and make a compelling argument for "why I want this", I'd certainly give it the time of day)