Live data from Hacker News

Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

squirt.io

21–30 of 213 posts

Re: Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

#21
Similar to what I did with the chrome extension Spree [1]. Though I find your pauses on periods to be a bit much. Code for Spree available on github [2]. The IIFE in spree.js can also function as a bookmarklet.

Also, Spree doesn't walk to an element's parent, which usually keeps it from getting into JS and ads, while still reading all of, say, a news article.

On another tack, quite a lovely site.

1. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/spree/aehoaolhojlm...

2. https://github.com/wpears/spree

Re: Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

#26
post #13

This project may consider a name-change, as googling for this after it's gone from the HN homepage will trigger ... interesting results. Especially if you're trying to show this to a co-worker in the office. Note to my boss: I'm sorry!

I believe that is part of the whole knock against spritz. In German, where some of the founding members of Spritz are from, spritz means a similar thing that squirt does in American culture.

Re: Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

#29
post #23
post #11

It doesn't work well. Reads out Javascript and side text/ads on websites.

highlight the text you want to read and then click the bookmarklet.

That doesn't work for me; latest Firefox. I tried a couple of random popular sites,including HN, and it didn't work on all of them.

This is a nice demo, but not a finished product.

Re: Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

#30
post #16
post #12

I've never thought much about my reading speed before, but after trying this and finding the deafault setting a bit slow, I decided to compare my natural reading speed. I was able to read the article I chose in about 85% of the time of the default 400WPM of the bookmarklet (I read the article first with a timer, and then reread with the bookmarklet), which would put me at 470WPM. With Squirt, I was only able to get u…

> I wonder if people really read one word at a time They don't. I always thought the whole point of speed reading was to ingest multiple words simultaneously. These speed reading tools should be extended so that they can show multiple words at once rather than one word at a time. A really ambitious improvement would be to automatically recognize very common phrases and constructions and to make an effort to always sh…

> These speed reading tools should be extended so that they can show multiple words at once rather than one word at a time.

http://spreeder.com/ allows you to put in multiple words.

However, if the code for this is available for anyone to edit/modify, perhaps anyone wanting that feature could add it.

Post reply on HN