Live data from Hacker News

Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 140 posts

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#2
This mentions 'anger' as in "After a full day of wild speculation and anger, the LA press have finally tracked down Nakamoto and he’s receiving a grilling."

I don't get it, who is angry? This guy could be angry about having his life invaded but where is the emotion coming from here?

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#3
post #2

This mentions 'anger' as in "After a full day of wild speculation and anger, the LA press have finally tracked down Nakamoto and he’s receiving a grilling." I don't get it, who is angry? This guy could be angry about having his life invaded but where is the emotion coming from here?

Some of it is from Reddit/Twitter/Bitcoiners who want Nakamoto to be left alone.

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#4
post #2

This mentions 'anger' as in "After a full day of wild speculation and anger, the LA press have finally tracked down Nakamoto and he’s receiving a grilling." I don't get it, who is angry? This guy could be angry about having his life invaded but where is the emotion coming from here?

The anger is coming from the bitcoin community, mostly because they're afraid for Satoshi's life. Someone could kidnap/torture him to try to get his bitcoins.

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#5
post #2

This mentions 'anger' as in "After a full day of wild speculation and anger, the LA press have finally tracked down Nakamoto and he’s receiving a grilling." I don't get it, who is angry? This guy could be angry about having his life invaded but where is the emotion coming from here?

[deleted]

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#6
In the video he says "I'm not involved in Bitcoin" (present tense) which is not inconsistent with what was reported in the Newsweek article:

>"I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it," he says, dismissing all further queries with a swat of his left hand. "It's been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longer have any connection."

I say this because the headline is trying to imply that Newsweek identified the wrong man, and as a result people are on twitter gloating about Newsweek being "wrong." Even if they do end up being wrong, this article and the corresponding video aren't evidence one way or the other.

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#8
post #2

This mentions 'anger' as in "After a full day of wild speculation and anger, the LA press have finally tracked down Nakamoto and he’s receiving a grilling." I don't get it, who is angry? This guy could be angry about having his life invaded but where is the emotion coming from here?

The anger is coming from the bitcoin community, mostly because they're afraid for Satoshi's life. Someone could kidnap/torture him to try to get his bitcoins.

Him, or any member of his immediate family, which the journalist of the original piece made sure could easily be tracked down.

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#9
post #6

In the video he says "I'm not involved in Bitcoin" (present tense) which is not inconsistent with what was reported in the Newsweek article: >"I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it," he says, dismissing all further queries with a swat of his left hand. "It's been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longer have any connection." I say this because the headline is trying to…

Well, according to LA Times reporter Andrea Chang he denied both present and past involvement, so that's something. https://twitter.com/byandreachang/status/441687863222996992

Re: Alleged Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Denies Bitcoin Involvement

#10
"Not involved with Bitcoin" leaves the door open to having been involved with Bitcoin in the past. I wonder if he was trying to deny past involvement with Bitcoin but worded it poorly, or if he was merely being clever in his wording, like a politician. Perhaps we'll find out.
Post reply on HN