Live data from Hacker News

DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

techcrunch.com

101–110 of 299 posts

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#101

Mark my words these guys are gonna be huge. Sure they are lacking in a lot of areas (like bananas mentions) but thats why you get VC funding and hire a badass like Jeff Lindsay ( http://progrium.com ) I'm really excited to see these dudes take on AWS with a higher-level and more performant platform.

Seems like they are also highly lacking in customer service https://vpsexperience.wordpress.com/

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#102
post #75
post #14

Adding to the commentary on here with something not so gushing: * kernels lag terribly behind the distributions meaning you're wide open sometimes. * can't resize or add storage * no freebsd support or custom kernels * VM availability problems. If you want to have another box, you aren't guaranteed to get one. * no IPv6 * somewhat shonky security reputation. * cant deliver to yahoo mail from their AMS2 IPs I've been…

Don't write about the owner's golf buddies either. https://vpsexperience.wordpress.com/ An odd experience, I would say.

[deleted]

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#103
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you suggest that they would proceed, considering that the DMCA forces them to "expeditiously remove or disable access to the allegedly infringing material", on the contingent of being liable themselves for copyright infringement?

The DMCA prescribes a dispute policy, that allows the accused to refute the evidence provided by the accusers. I've seen numerous complaints indicating that Digital Ocean abides no such policies. http://digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digitalocean...

The dispute (counter-notice) and put-back procedures in the DMCA say that the provider can put the content back online if the copyright owner does not bring a lawsuit within 14 days. I don't see anyone in that thread saying they violate this procedure; all I see is talk about some 48 hours limit, which is definitively not in the law.

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#104
post #75
post #14

Adding to the commentary on here with something not so gushing: * kernels lag terribly behind the distributions meaning you're wide open sometimes. * can't resize or add storage * no freebsd support or custom kernels * VM availability problems. If you want to have another box, you aren't guaranteed to get one. * no IPv6 * somewhat shonky security reputation. * cant deliver to yahoo mail from their AMS2 IPs I've been…

Don't write about the owner's golf buddies either. https://vpsexperience.wordpress.com/ An odd experience, I would say.

I kind of doubt this is about the golf angle so much as the creepy obsession the writer seems to have with this guy. Calling out some random Google employee and publishing his chat logs along with derogatory comments while seemingly looking to get him in trouble with his employer is harassment. I'm not sure why "Digital Ocean enforces its terms of service" is considered scandalous.

(Full disclosure: My only relationship with Digital Ocean is having been offered a free month of hosting with them once. Never used it.)

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#105
post #30

We run our infrastructure on both AWS and DigitalOcean. 1) DO consistently beats the price performance. 2) DO has simple pricing model --> No ondemand / reserved instances 3) AWS is more feature rich but DO continues to add new functionalities like private networking and new data centers

Comparing DO to AWS is extremely disingenuous unless you're only comparing compute per $. Running in AWS, we get access to unlimited storage through S3, EBS volumes we can move between instances, a CDN, etc. Digital Ocean is like the place with a bunch of servers in the garage. Yes, its cheap. No, I would not trust it to run my business. I'm very interested to see how they think they can compete with AWS, considering…

You're right about EBS, however I kind of scratch my head over S3. Yeah, I guess it's integrated in the sense that you can access it from the same account, however, try creating an EC2 instance without a publicly addressable IP. You can't access S3 at all from your VPC, which makes S3 not usable in many use cases.

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#106
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I too have been bit by the droplet limit. $60 credit (but no credit card) in my account, wanted to spin up a fast box to build a kernel, but I was locked out of the larger droplets. Never did get a straight answer as to why, just a suggestion to link a credit card. Oh well.

There are two droplet limits, one is the number of droplets that you can spin up which you can see in your settings page: https://cloud.digitalocean.com/settings The second is if a customer signs up using Paypal we restrict some of the larger sizes, this is done to minimize the amount of fraud we have to deal with. Unfortunately we deal with a high amount of abusive and fraudulent signups so we've had to instate a lo…

In my case it was the paypal/larger size restriction. And to be fair to DO, once I had opened a ticket (and provided links to the company website, twitter, facebook, and reason for wanting larger droplets) they explained that adding a credit card to the account would allow me to spin up the larger droplets. I didn't want to bother my boss, so I just dropped it.

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#107
post #75
post #14

Adding to the commentary on here with something not so gushing: * kernels lag terribly behind the distributions meaning you're wide open sometimes. * can't resize or add storage * no freebsd support or custom kernels * VM availability problems. If you want to have another box, you aren't guaranteed to get one. * no IPv6 * somewhat shonky security reputation. * cant deliver to yahoo mail from their AMS2 IPs I've been…

Don't write about the owner's golf buddies either. https://vpsexperience.wordpress.com/ An odd experience, I would say.

[deleted]

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comparing DO to AWS is extremely disingenuous unless you're only comparing compute per $. Running in AWS, we get access to unlimited storage through S3, EBS volumes we can move between instances, a CDN, etc. Digital Ocean is like the place with a bunch of servers in the garage. Yes, its cheap. No, I would not trust it to run my business. I'm very interested to see how they think they can compete with AWS, considering…

You're right about EBS, however I kind of scratch my head over S3. Yeah, I guess it's integrated in the sense that you can access it from the same account, however, try creating an EC2 instance without a publicly addressable IP. You can't access S3 at all from your VPC, which makes S3 not usable in many use cases.

> however, try creating an EC2 instance without a publicly addressable IP. You can't access S3 at all from your VPC, which makes S3 not usable in many use cases.

I don't see the problem with this. Either give your EC2 instance in your VPC a dedicated public IP and configure the security group to disallow all inbound connections, or use a public IP that routes all traffic for your VPC and again, secure it with a security group.

We do this right now with our environment, as our application is heavily EC2S3 dependent. It works without issue.

Re: DigitalOcean Raises $37.2M From Andreessen Horowitz to Take on AWS

#109
post #36
post #27

I use linode and was drawing comparisons between two: 1. 8 cores on linode is what binds me to it. Linode rules here 2. Digital ocean is cheaper than linode 3. More Network transfer in linode (minimum 2TB) 4. Digital ocean offers more RAM 5. Private network - Does not exist on Linode. Shame. DO Rules.. What else...

> 5. Private network - Does not exist on Linode. Shame. What do you mean? Actually private network did not exist on DO until recently and it's been on Linode for a long time.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN