Live data from Hacker News

The Face Behind Bitcoin?

mag.newsweek.com

91–100 of 703 posts

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#91

"What?" The police officer balks. "This is the guy who created Bitcoin? It looks like he's living a pretty humble life." That quote smells totally fake to me. There's just no way some random office would know what Bitcoin is, and even if he did, that's not something a police officer would say. I don't know what that says about the rest of the article, but that quote doesn't read very factual to me.

Yeah, sounds like artistic license to me.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#92

Can this be real? a guy calls the cops, but admits he was involved? "Tacitly acknowledging his role in the Bitcoin project, he looks down, staring at the pavement and categorically refuses to answer questions." "I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it," he says, dismissing all further queries with a swat of his left hand. "It's been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longe…

It had better be real, because the entire story hangs around the unprovable observation of that vague admission. Otherwise this is a story about harassing a shut-in and his family.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#93
post #14
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Open it in private browsing/Incognito mode and you'll be fine.

Private browsing didn't work for me. Just a blank page for 5 seconds, then a full-page ad and no article.

Setting the user agent to Googlebot [1] worked for me, images and all.

[1] Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#94
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? From the photo of his house, people on reddit have already got his address. And the photo shows his car registration. They also explicitly state he's got keys worth ~$400 million. Seems like painting a target on him.

The photo of the house and the car is extraneous, I agree. However, there is he, apparently posing for a photo. This is a man who decided to use his own family name in the Bitcoin papers, and the journalist simply searched people with the family name to find a decent match and did a lot of leg work.

I'm not sure it's a photo she or Newsweek took. If this was a print article there would be a photo credit. Maybe she found it somewhere?

In the article she says she only saw him once with the cops, and then had a very very short discussion with her when cops were present.

If the photo implies (as it did to me and apparently you) that he consented to an interview he didn't actually consent to, that's misleading journalism.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#95
post #28

So Newsweek outed a guy who allegedly owns half a billion dollars in pseudo-untraceable, digital cash? I hope they're also going to chip in for a permanent security detail... More seriously, I think they could have done a better job reporting on the identity without giving so much away: * A picture of his house is posted, identical to the one in Google Street View * The license plate is relatively clear in the high-r…

A determined attacker (the kind that needs worrying about) would find Satoshi even if Newsweek hadn't posted a photo of the house or license plate in their article.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel really bad for Mr. Nakamoto. He would have likely been found out at some point, but this is the worst way for it to happen. Now everyone knows. If he was put off by just one journalist visit, I imagine he'll consider relocating now.

Was he "put off"? He seems to have consented to the interview, and to have posed for a picture. Having interacted enough with bad members of the media [NB: there are also good ones], I'm not so naive as to think that there's no way they could have persuaded him to do it with lies or bullshit or empty threats, but without evidence for that he could have just said "I don't want to talk to you" and left it at that. EDIT…

Why do you think that's a picture he posed for? She probably got it from one of the family members she spoke to.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#97
post #67
post #22

Being labeled Satoshi regardless of truth is pretty much going to get you robbed, kidnapped or killed. This dude lives in this town and has $400M of untraceable currency? The article gives his name, face, address and relatives. You can be sure as hell that somebody will do something stupid to try and get to it. I wouldn't wish this label upon anybody, it's exactly why the community tries to avoid speculating about it…

Doxxing? That is such a stupid term. It’s called journalism. Reporting on people with a huge impact on the world is sort of what journalists do. Of course that includes identifying information. Sure, publishing identifying information of people who did nothing special is unethical but that can hardly be said about Satoshi. If the story is correct then this is some insanely rich dude who got rich by inventing Bitcoin…

Regarding your point about paranoia: Here's an example of people in Ecuador executing a father and son for a mere $20,000: http://www.reddit.com/r/MorbidReality/comments/1zktth/quito_...

This is what the Nakamoto family now has to worry about. It wasn't a random killing. There were at least 6 people arrested in connection with the murders. Apparently the robbers had people inside the bank who they were paying to alert them whenever someone withdrew large amounts of cash.

People get killed over money a lot. It's probably not paranoia. I would recommend you watch the video to understand the gruesome nature of what Nakamoto now has to live with.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#98
post #67
post #22

Being labeled Satoshi regardless of truth is pretty much going to get you robbed, kidnapped or killed. This dude lives in this town and has $400M of untraceable currency? The article gives his name, face, address and relatives. You can be sure as hell that somebody will do something stupid to try and get to it. I wouldn't wish this label upon anybody, it's exactly why the community tries to avoid speculating about it…

Doxxing? That is such a stupid term. It’s called journalism. Reporting on people with a huge impact on the world is sort of what journalists do. Of course that includes identifying information. Sure, publishing identifying information of people who did nothing special is unethical but that can hardly be said about Satoshi. If the story is correct then this is some insanely rich dude who got rich by inventing Bitcoin…

If you're so comfortable with journalism, I'd like to interview you. But first please provide:

• Full names and home towns of your children and your wife

• Picture of your house – include a clear photo of your car's license plate

• Your home town, so anyone can locate you on Google Maps

• Your work history

• Your net worth

• Your health history

• Any notable personality traits you have, so the whole world can comment on them

Seriously, put up or shut up.

Re: The Face Behind Bitcoin?

#100
post #16

The author of the piece can be reached in these ways: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zpmo8/the_face_beh... If you think this article is a dangerous invasion of privacy, tell her and her employers (Newsweek).

Well, she's also rather helpful in giving us things like these:

http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Jer...

Which may or may not be out of date

http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/vis...

Which has other useful info on it.

Post reply on HN