61–70 of 138 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a new technology called "static HTML page"... I hear MS FrontPage can export this newfangled format.
At my uni there were a large number of profs with websites that, if you viewed the source, showed that they'd been creating in MS Word. This was a CS department. Slightly depressing.
Every single troubleshooting tip is of greater urgency than the last!
I think half the people here haven't seen the ultimate crime: http://fabricland.co.uk/ The service in the shop is just as bad as the web site as well!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At my uni there were a large number of profs with websites that, if you viewed the source, showed that they'd been creating in MS Word. This was a CS department. Slightly depressing.
Yes, because if you design a new alloy for improved performance of an f1 engine cilinder, you need to do your own oil changes too, right?
That page loaded ridiculously fast. Maybe flat HTML is the way to go.
yeah, reminds me of this other website: http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ should we be hard-coding our styles into html and stop making stylesheets though? seems like a balance is needed
This is almost as wonderful as Subway's old website. I think that one had something like five HTML tags and a few BODY tags sprinkled randomly throughout.
I'd like to have a word with the person who decided that "something" should show up in a browser regardless of how broken the markup is.
This is almost as wonderful as Subway's old website. I think that one had something like five HTML tags and a few BODY tags sprinkled randomly throughout.
I'd like to have a word with the person who decided that "something" should show up in a browser regardless of how broken the markup is.
I think half the people here haven't seen the ultimate crime: http://fabricland.co.uk/ The service in the shop is just as bad as the web site as well!