Live data from Hacker News

Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

online.wsj.com

91–100 of 305 posts

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#91
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately I get the feeling more and more everyday that this really is just a ponzi scheme built on really cool new technology. I mean honestly most people who buy bitcoin aren't looking to spend it or use it because of convenience, they are looking to hold it in the hopes that the price continues to go up and on the way encouraging everyone they know to buy in to drive up the price.

> I mean honestly most people who buy bitcoin aren't looking to spend it or use it because of convenience, they are looking to hold it in the hopes that the price continues to go up and on the way encouraging everyone they know to buy in to drive up the price. Even if that's true, that doesn't make it a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi scheme is an investment in a phony entity run by a fraudster (the Ponzi) who's promising guar…

Bitcoin is much more like a speculative bubble than a Ponzi scheme.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#92

Perhaps naïve question but can't see any info on this one. So, the Bitcoin ledger is still intact. 750,000 is quite a lot of Bitcoins to be stolen. Mt.Gox may have been shitty built but they must have kept some logs, account databases, etc. What are the odds of recovering the coins/exchange money that was lost? Technically sounds like pretty good odds? No?

At the same time it's quite easy for it to all be gone forever due to good old fashioned incompetence.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#94
post #70

Anyone stupid enough to invest a significant portion of their net worth in a nascent currency like BitCoin only have themselves to blame, high risk.

Bitcoin hasn't suffered any loss; the exchange rate has been relatively flat all year. People who let a third party hold their assets lost those assets due to that entity's negligence. That can happen to shovels in a storage unit -- the underlying asset is irrelevant to this particular risk.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Losses can only be taken on your initial investment amount if you have Bitcoins in MtGox. This means that if you invested $10k a year back, and your Bitcoins are now worth $1000k, you can only take $10k in losses. Luckily I have realized my gains which means I can deduct $3k every year in losses with infinite rollover.

I believe your understanding if the situation is flawed, if you are a US citizen. The $3000 per year applies to capital losses. You did not suffer a capital loss. You suffered a loss due to bank insolvency. If you realized your gains in 2013, you actually owe taxes on $500,000 for your 2013 taxes, which is roughly $250k. I believe your losses due to bank insolvency will apply to your income for 2014. But you may be o…

Yep, talk to a CPA. One key issue is you may not have a capital loss, but rather a casualty, which by my read of the flowchart becomes a miscellaneous itemized deduction. Those are limited to 2% of MAGI and I don't believe they carry over. Also, there is a hard cap at $20k for lost deposits. See publication 547. It may be to your advantage to file it under a loss to personal property (form 4648) - the math isn't straightforward for me to work out.

Talk to a CPA. This is the sort of thing they live for.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#96
post #70

Anyone stupid enough to invest a significant portion of their net worth in a nascent currency like BitCoin only have themselves to blame, high risk.

Bitcoin hasn't suffered any loss; the exchange rate has been relatively flat all year. People who let a third party hold their assets lost those assets due to that entity's negligence. That can happen to shovels in a storage unit -- the underlying asset is irrelevant to this particular risk.

A currency is only as good as it's exchanges, AFAIK Mtgok was the biggest and most trusted, for me this is a death blow to bitcoin.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Losses can only be taken on your initial investment amount if you have Bitcoins in MtGox. This means that if you invested $10k a year back, and your Bitcoins are now worth $1000k, you can only take $10k in losses. Luckily I have realized my gains which means I can deduct $3k every year in losses with infinite rollover.

I believe your understanding if the situation is flawed, if you are a US citizen. The $3000 per year applies to capital losses. You did not suffer a capital loss. You suffered a loss due to bank insolvency. If you realized your gains in 2013, you actually owe taxes on $500,000 for your 2013 taxes, which is roughly $250k. I believe your losses due to bank insolvency will apply to your income for 2014. But you may be o…

I am not clear with taxes, but I will go and consult with a CPA.

Fortunately I did not keep everything in MtGox. If it turns out that I do owe $250k in taxes, I won't be in trouble.

Thanks.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#98
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, this fiasco hasn't affected in the slightest my beliefs about the protocol. Hell, if anything it might've been a small point in favour of decentralization.

That sounds like the reasoning of the gun-lobby. When bad things happen to do with guns, they tell us we need more guns.

I would've preferred to let the banks fail in 2008, short-term economic consequences be damned. That experiment is now playing out in the unregulated crypto-economy. (I've got my popcorn.)

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#99
post #25
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't it more like walking down the same bad street every night with other people's cash in their hands, getting mugged repeatedly, not telling anyone and still taking more money?

This is a very good point. But they were also dumb enough not to realize they were getting mugged, or so they claim. Maybe I should have used "pick-pocketed" instead of mugged as an example. I am not trying to give them an excuse but we don't seem to have enough anger against the criminals that caused this.

> But they were also dumb enough not to realize they were getting mugged, or so they claim.

This is what I don't get, and which makes it hard to trust that they indeed "lost" this many coins. At the very least one would expect that for a company like this, they would regularly reconcile what the blockchain states the content of the wallets they control is, and what their internal customer records says should be there.

That's the very barest minimum I'd expect anyone to do. And the moment they found a discrepancy they should have suspended everything until they'd figured out why there was a discrepancy.

If they've truly managed to keep losing coins over years, it means they had no effective audit mechanisms in place at all.

Whoever took these coins certainly also is to blame, but if they've managed to lose the coins that way, this ought to be criminal levels of negligence.

Re: Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy Protection

#100
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bitcoin hasn't suffered any loss; the exchange rate has been relatively flat all year. People who let a third party hold their assets lost those assets due to that entity's negligence. That can happen to shovels in a storage unit -- the underlying asset is irrelevant to this particular risk.

A currency is only as good as it's exchanges, AFAIK Mtgok was the biggest and most trusted, for me this is a death blow to bitcoin.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN